Is it the Government's business To tell me I have to give a certain amount to poorly run socialistic programs?

Question

I have as much sympathy as anyone for the poor, but that does not mean that the government has the right to appropriate my tax money to pay for the needs of the poor. The more money we hand over to the government, the more power they gain and the easier it becomes for tyranny to reign. Progressive taxation is immoral and threatens our freedoms.

"We have the right as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right to appropriate a dollar of the public money." Rep. David Crockett; Approx.1838

to read the story behind this statement (taken from the House of Representatives Website:


http://www.house.gov/paul/nytg.htm

None of the programs mentioned at the point that I am writing this are socialistic.

I am talking about progressive taxation programs such as unemployment programs, welfare, social security, and funding for public schools and childcare programs.

I have no problem paying taxes for the expenses for programs required to carry out those duties specifically enumerated in the constitution.

90% of federal tax dollars are spent on progressive programs and are unconstitutional

"Also a quote from some guy 168 years ago really has no meaning today."

Actually it has a lot of meaning. If you would have bothered to read the whole story you would have known that the statement is very relevant to the discussion of welfare and quite frankly to Hurricane Katrina.

I am not sure which problems you are talking about, but history has a habit of repeating itself and some truths are true regardless of time and place.

Answer 1

Just remember that when no one wants to pay taxes to fund the military that is protecting you or the police or your local utilities who plow the snow and maintain the streets.

Answer 2

Where do you get the idea that you don't have to fund things you don't like.

I don't like tanks, I also don't like Congress. I don't see any reason why my taxes dollars support them.

Also a quote from some guy 168 years ago really has no meaning today. Many of the problems we have today were not even around back then.

We all choose to be citizens of this country, and we choose to accept that we choose (vote for) the people who will decided where our tax dollars go. If your guy votes for a bill helping people you don't want to help, next time his name is on a ballot vote for somebody else.

Answer 3

To all of us asserting that medicare is a socialistic software in basic terms like ObamaCare, you're apparently ignorant related to the adjustments. Medicare is a central authority run software to help the elder of their wellbeing costs. there's a huge distinction in that and ObamaCare. With Obama care, the individuals who're actual getting it for unfastened, are extremely, if in any respect, paying in to it. and individuals working enormous companies are compelled to purchase the coverage for his or her workers or pay a value in the event that they do no longer. Now it relatively is a socialist software. no longer medicare, it relatively is somewhat very comparable to social secure practices. all of us get it at a definite age, no longer based on how lots we make or any of the different million reasons, and all of us pay into it in some way or yet another. you may call that a "social" software when you consider that all and sundry contributes into it and later takes out, in basic terms like SOCIAL secure practices. It does not make it "socialistic" although. it relatively is obviously touching on socialism in a ideological experience.