English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

These were the main clues: Stratigraphy, Sediments of Continental Rifting, Evidences of Colliding Boundaries, Tropical Marine Corals, Mountain Belts, Magnetic Reversals and Paleomagnetism, Fossil Evidence and Living Genera

To read more about it go to this website.

2006-12-08 08:32:07 · answer #1 · answered by heartiagram 2 · 1 0

a lot of scientists forget this, yet once you have been to get rid of each and all of the water out of the oceans, you may word that there is airborne dirt and dirt below. The continents at the instant are not in undemanding terms lilie pads floating around in pond of water. The continental flow theory in undemanding terms exists because of the fact South united statesa. and Africa seem to extra healthful extremely properly to the bare eye. What they don't inform you is they might desire to shrink Africa via 40% while they placed their fashions mutually. you will additionally word that each and everyone of needed united statesa. is long previous from those fashions. If continents had fairly moved that a approaches over tens of millions of years, there is not any reason to have faith that there may well be any shape resemblance. Land hundreds that length shifting that a approaches with plenty water, airborne dirt and dirt, and recycling of the land, and erosion might not resemble one yet another. At right this moment's cutting-edge erosion rates, the earth will erode thoroughly flat in 14 million years, and of course would be lined via water. If continental drifting has been happening as extensively because of the fact the pangaea style shows, and for that long, this finished planet may well be a water international precise now. this is real that he continents are at the instant shifting aside (Atlantic) approximately as rapid as your fingernails improve. yet this has not something to do with proving while they started, the place they started, or how consistent the fee has been and so forth... additionally, Wegener's theory is a theory. this is not pronounced demonstrable actuality. easily you're sufficiently old to realize that each thing isn't because it style of feels. A negating theory is hardly info against the Biblical account of the international's history. in actuality, it would desire to pan out that the belief's time-line is misguided, and it would desire to circulate directly to coach the cataclysmic events defined as going on for the time of the flood. in case you examine your Bible, you will locate that there replaced into plenty extra effective than rain inflicting all that water to cover the earth.

2016-12-11 05:07:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Carbon dating perhaps. As new earth is formed at areas of plate expansion and old earth is pushed under the crust where two plates meet, we can date the material using carbon dating.
The age of the rocks and earth where the expansion is taking place is very young in comparison to the age of the rocks where two plates crush up against each other.

2006-12-08 08:31:30 · answer #3 · answered by Louis G 6 · 2 0

Hi Just look at the mountains that exist at crush edges. Himalayas, Andes, Rockies, the worn eastern mountains. Pretty good evidence.

2006-12-08 08:30:59 · answer #4 · answered by Cirric 7 · 2 0

figure continental drift? look at a map =)
proof? plate tectonic

2006-12-08 08:29:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Albert Wegener discovered similar fossils and rock types in South America and Africa where it appears they may have been together at one time.

2006-12-08 08:30:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Pangaea

2006-12-08 10:01:23 · answer #7 · answered by EA 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers