Ok I have a citation for a history book. I took an article from it. Now I'm taking another article from the same book. Only the name of the article and the page number changes. This is how I did it. Is this right?
Bailkey, Nels M., and Richard Lim. "Marcus Aurelius." Readings in Ancient History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002. 473-474.
Ibid., "Tacitus, Annals" The Rebellion of Boudicca in Britain." 423-427.
Thank you very much.
2006-12-08 07:46:51 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Are Bailkley and Lim the authors of the article "Marcus Aurelius" AND the authors/editors of the entire work, or just the authors of the work? If the author is different, their name should be included in the citiation. Here's an example.
Marcus A. author, "Marcus Aurelius," in Readings in Ancient History, ed. Nels M. Baikley and Richard Lim (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002), 473-474.
Tacitus, "The Rebellion of Boudicca in Britain," in Readings in Ancient History, ed. Nels M. Baikley and Richard Lim (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002), 423-427.
**this is assuming that Tacitus is author of second article/excerpt, and that there is an author other thant Baikley/Lim for the Marcus article, and I'd assume that there would be as this appears to be a source book. If Bailkey/Lim are authors of "Marcus..." citation will look like this:
Nels M. Bailkey and Richard Lim. "Marcus Aurelius." in Readings in Ancient History (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2002), 473-474.
Either way, I wouldn't use Ibid., since you're not citing the Readings in Ancient History, but actually two separate articles within the same sourcebook.
***this also assumes that these are footnote citations, if these are for your bibliography just take the ()'s out and change the punctuation back to .'s and ,'s . Also switch author's name to last, first rather than first last.
2006-12-08 10:01:25 · answer #1 · answered by just an inkling 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is very normal 2 fall 4 who is older, n in a authoritative postion. teachers experience this with students everyday. its great 2 have those feelings but u must understand that 4 way 2 many resons it is best that you do not take this 2 seriously or try 2 make a relationship or anything other than u r a student they r a tutor or whathave u. just think of it as ur first secret love. u may have a lot of them in your life u may only have one. but a secret love is a love that is forbidden that could never be. treasure it as a forbidden love n leave it be. forbidden things that hurt a lot when u try 2 do them anyways. it may not hurt at first but in the end its gonna be a *****. good luck n remember have fun n enjoy life, do what u want within reason and always thinking about what ur doing n being able 2 take responsibility 4 the things u do.
2016-05-23 07:19:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It really depends what referencing system your university expects you to use. However, generally, if you are referring to an article within a sourcebook, or within a journal, you would only use ibid if it is from the same article and you have not referred to another source in between these two references.
Try this, its the one we use at Glasgow for history essays
http://www.history.arts.gla.ac.uk/undergrad.htm
2006-12-09 03:06:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
historians use Chicago Manual of Style or Turabian Style for citations. it also depends on if the citation is a footnote, endnote, or biblography. here are two website to check out for examples. good luck
2006-12-08 12:55:55 · answer #4 · answered by jenn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Works for me. You should check whatever citation reference you are suppposed to follow.
2006-12-08 07:50:06 · answer #5 · answered by Aggie80 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Looks good to me too
2006-12-08 08:48:14 · answer #6 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Looks good to me.
2006-12-08 07:49:55 · answer #7 · answered by Sophist 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe your citing was done correctly.
2006-12-08 07:50:36 · answer #8 · answered by Clarkie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋