YES
He is a shallow individual. Like Serving Nancy Pelosi Chief Boyardee spaghetti. when he invited her to lunch.
The Whitehouse has the finniest Cooks in America with access to Epicurean delights. But Bush ordered a can of spaghetti for the luncheon. When the staff presented the silver trays with lunch. He could not contain his snickers and laughter. Saying "I thought that is what you Italians eat"
Go big Red Go
2006-12-08 07:51:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by 43 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Well the simple fact that he is Bush tells me that he will just smirk and not cooperate with the opposition. However, I don't think "Democrat party" is intentional. I do it myself. It has been the way a lot of people say it for a long time. I have only heard this being discussed at all in the last few months. Kind of struck me as news that anyone gave it a thought. Heck if I want to toss insults at democrats, I would be more crass.
Now there are very few reasons I still like Bush in any way. I wil have loads of fun watching him snicker at democrats for 2 years. I'm planning Mitt Romney's victory celebration as we speak.(oops I guess we ain't speaking.)
As I type?
Hey 43, is that story true? I hope so. I peed myself laughing. Well not really but it was funny.
EDIT wow 2 theocracy freaks on 2 different question. Unsettling trend. Was the tin foil hat store closed today? Ugh. I would dearly love to sit in on one of your conventions, and hold my breath for an example of that being remotely logical.
Nah I'm not that depressed. If I did that it would be suicide. Haw haw.
2006-12-08 07:50:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow stinky Foot I experience that your aggravated. How approximately I brush that chip off your shoulder. possibly we would desire to consistently initiate asserting Republic whilst touching on Republicans, we can initiate asserting Republic occasion. to grant you an certainly answer The Shoe on your Face, it stems back to the Bush administration. when you consider that Bush and different fellow republicans have been given bored with being referred to as cronies each and all the time, and being instructed that they prepare cronyism from the democrats. the belief replaced into too coin a term for democrats that sounds ..... nicely...... undesirable. Bush all started calling the Democratic occasion the Democrat occasion, it didnt take long for Fox information to evolve this term, for that reason standardizing the term for the rest individuals. different a thank you to jab at Democrats is to apply this in such techniques as Democrat Presidents, Democrat ideals etc etc. that's a thank you to attack Democrats without actual attacking them. The Bush administration additionally coined different words which includes phonetically conversing to declare Newcuhler rather of asserting New sparkling, as interior the word Nuclear. At one time you have been making an fool of your self for mispronouncing this word besides the shown fact that George W. Bush additionally standardized this and made it "cool" to declare it that way. confident it relatively is stressful that Republicans misuse the word Democrat, yet remember The Shoe on your Face it relatively is an indication of desperation, a thank you to snatch at something you may previously falling off the cliff. This term would be seen further and extra many times now that Obama is president, and at last as quickly as we get yet another witch hunt for Obama like we did for bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky you will hear the word democrat misused with the help of far the main. Misuse of the word democrat might stem back even extra effective besides the shown fact that it replaced into no longer till approximately 2000 that it grew to alter into oftentimes going on.
2016-10-14 07:05:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by trinkle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are tenable answers to this excellent inquiry.
a) Bush is actively showing his contempt and even hatred of the Democrats by refusing to even call the party by its proper name, or
b) He is so dang stupid he would doesn't even know the porper name of the oldest political party in the nation; I don't know if this answer is plausible though as he hasn't made any bone-headed decisions in his presidency (has he?).
2006-12-08 08:05:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, when you refer to "Republican" or "Republican Party", you don't change the word "Republican." So, it might make sense to say "Democrat" and "Democrat Party." Democratic means something different...You know, like living in a "democratic" country. That doesn't mean that everyone in the country is a Democrat...Language 101.
2006-12-08 07:52:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by sacolunga 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
He can't say "Democratic party" because he doesn't believe in anything democratic like the Constitution or Democracy. He believes in Theocracy which is really what the Republican Party has become only he can't say that in public.
2006-12-08 07:51:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
It might be, but if the Democrats are smart, they will pass intelligent bills and let Bush veto them if he wants. This will straighten their position in the 2008 elections.
2006-12-08 07:47:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Paul K 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bush is unable to speak English. That explains everything
2006-12-08 07:50:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sean 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so. If you pay attention to his press conference, where he isn't reading a speech, it is clear that he just doesn't have a very good command of the English language.
2006-12-08 07:56:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not him, it's more prevalent than you think. 20 years ago, I had a political science professor who used the same terminology.
2006-12-08 07:48:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Teekno 7
·
1⤊
0⤋