http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtC9Gm5wL.Uk5qxQiq6MGCcezKIX?qid=20061208122917AAa7IHo
Captainob responded to a question regarding Hastert by stating that
"he did nothing against the rules." Is that not the most arrogant, unethical set of values in place today besides Bush? Besides covering up a child-molesting gay man that ran the House committee for children, I guess I don't see anything wrong with it. Those are minor details, though.
Yay for Captainob the "NEO-CON RETARD!"
2006-12-08 07:40:50 · 11 answers · asked by NEO-CON RETARD 1.03 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I didnt say it, they did. so you are talking about the ethics commitee. but thanks for letting everyone know what they said.
and typical of you libs dont tell the whole story....
"he did nothing against the rules,that is what the ethics commitee said so" seems I made that very clear.
2006-12-08 07:46:59 · answer #1 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Gosh once you get this previous there are an excellent style of opportunities to chosen from while i became into approximately 25 I went via this freaky stretch the place i became into getting stress assaults on a accepted foundation So late one night they get fairly undesirable and that i've got self assurance that i'm having a coronary heart attack Ipersistent myself to the well being facility and as i'm mendacity flat my lower back , an fairly particularly EKG tech with an excellent rack and way too a lot epidermis exhibiting , leans over me to attach the leads and says "loosen up sir each thing would be effective"
2016-10-05 01:34:25 · answer #2 · answered by lashbrook 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah.
Same guy who sent me THIS on 11-30-2006:
From: captainobvious_lj
Subject: yes you did misread that.
Message: I stated upfront i have done it too. but if you would read all my thoughts or questions you would see I have tried to give my points and backed it with facts. you havent, Ive read most of your, (on all your accounts) and all the other liberal agenda people on here and have not seen any true educated, substanciated thought. this question was in earnest not a rant I want to know why you and your likes do what you do. this is the problem. so many people are out to do it that when you are honestly asking a question their is some "hiddin bash" or "implied meaning" I ask questions with my beliefs to then get others. they cant be non biased they are what I see. well most like I said sometimes I point out funny answers. I have fun sometimes too believe it or not but not all the time. that is why I asked this question.
2006-12-08 07:47:48 · answer #3 · answered by cannon Ball! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sarcasm
2006-12-08 07:42:05 · answer #4 · answered by Sean 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I get your point.. but like Sean I have to tell you that if you look through Y! A you will see some of the most disingenuous answers from conservatives when defending their side. How can anyone defend Foley and Hastert?
2006-12-08 07:46:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
He said "He did nothing against the rules" - RULES, not values. Rules are written laws. Which ones are you implying that Hastart has violated? Can you prove that he covered up any wrong-doing? Do you have specifics? If so, let us in on it.
2006-12-08 07:44:44 · answer #6 · answered by Leah 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe that he actually molested any children. He sent inappropriate emails and text messages. I'm not saying it's right, just that it wasn't what you wrote. I'm curious to know your opinion of Gerry Studds.
2006-12-08 07:45:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why did Cpt Knobjob like reading with Rep Foley? Because he got to turn the pages.
2006-12-08 07:43:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
He didn't break the rules. He was following the GOP "leave no child's behind" program.
2006-12-08 07:43:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
http://vpoet.net/flash/youare.swf
2006-12-08 07:42:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋