English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If I traveled the speed of light and had a flash light with me so when I turned it on would the light comming off the flash light be traviling the same speeed as me or 2X faster that the origianal speed of light ? And would it even be called the speed of light any more?

2006-12-08 07:18:09 · 14 answers · asked by Jnsp52 2 in Science & Mathematics Physics

14 answers

The speed of light is constant in all frames of reference.
To you, the light will appear to be moving away from you at the speed of light, just like it always does; it will not look like anything special. To someone "at rest" (the person to whom you are measuring your relative speed to be the speed of light), you and the light will appear tied, the light will be moving at the speed of light, as so will you.

But it is important to remember that no object with you (that includes you and the flash light), can every travel at, or exceed, the speed of light. Doing so would require an infinite amount of energy...and in the entire universe there is not an infinite amount of energy.

2006-12-08 07:37:18 · answer #1 · answered by mrjeffy321 7 · 2 1

sturdy sufficient. Time does no longer circulate slower for speedy gadgets. interestingly to you, assuming you would be desk bound, that element is passing slower for speedy gadgets. If there are not any accelerations advantages - each little thing is constantly shifting on the equivalent speeds relative to one yet another - then there is not any thank you to tell who's moving and who's at rest. Now the twin paradox, which you sort of paraphrased right here, has 3 accelerations in it. you initiate from entertainment and attain an extraordinarily extreme velocity. After a time, you swap around this implies which you slow down, you momentarily provide up, and you velocity as much as a extreme velocity lower back. for this reason you attain earth and sluggish to a stop. At each acceleration, you journey a stress which the earthbound guy or woman would not so that's sparkling who's in circulation and who's at rest. as a result, you are going to return after 10 years some time maximum sensible to look for out that a lots longer time has exceeded in the worldwide. Now star trek assumes there's a thank you to journey exterior of the 4 dimensional area that defines the universe - the so-universal as subspace. in this subspace, relativity would not persist with - that's exterior the universe exceptionally lots - so which you need to circulate from element to element in a finite quantity of time and, the time it takes to traverse the hollow as measured by employing the starship's clock could properly be the time that elapses in the universe - style of no longer likely in spite of the incontrovertible fact that integral in case you're writting one hour long television episodes. there is not any info for the style of shuttle use in popular guy or woman trek.

2016-12-18 10:01:40 · answer #2 · answered by vergie 4 · 0 0

practically,this is impossible

theoretically,if you traveled at the speed of light,the light from the flashlight would go 180000 mps because of special relativity.

time and space[and mass]dilate relative to speed so,at the speed of light time and space would dilate in a way that light would move at the same speed as when the flash light is at rest

2006-12-08 09:36:43 · answer #3 · answered by the professor 2 · 0 0

The light would be traveling at the same speed as you are.

2006-12-08 07:20:50 · answer #4 · answered by Science nerd 3 · 0 2

Oddly enough, the same speed.

Your hypothetical example is unreal of course.

But say you were on a plane going 300 MPH.
you shine a flashlight out the front window.

The beam of light is travelling "c", not "c+300 mph"

2006-12-08 07:23:09 · answer #5 · answered by H_A_V_0_C 5 · 0 2

Suppose you are at 0.99999 C wrt frame A ,
the speed of light for a person in frame A is "C"
the speed of light for you will be "C"

for finding the result at c
we use RELATIVISTIC VELOCITY TRANSFORMATION

if v is your velocity w.r.t frame A , and V' is velocity of something wrt you then velocity of object which you saw as V'

will be (V'+v) /(1 + vV'/"C"^2 )

Now assume that velocity of light for you is "C" , if the velocity of light for you is "C" (suppose)

then velocity of light for person at A will be given by putting both V' and v ="C"

It shows that velocity of light for person at A will be "C" which is correct so speed of light for you must still be "C"

But the actual result is a paradox as no one has ever attained that velocity .

2006-12-08 07:54:11 · answer #6 · answered by abhishek d 1 · 1 1

that means you cant catch it

the speed of light is like how fast people think they should drive their cars

like if you put 120mph on the freeway it still would just be a road with something extra on it

so if the sign that say 65mph goes with the road then that the speed limit of the road because you can add speed to anything

i believe in the future people learn that lkight has many speeds

just like matter can make anything people want to use

2006-12-08 07:51:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Speed of light won't change regardless of your speed.
My theory is you won't know where you're going since the light coming out of your flashlight isn't reflected back to your eyes when you travel in the speed of light.
Ha Ha Ha

2006-12-08 07:23:34 · answer #8 · answered by Optimist 1 · 0 2

You would never reach the speed of light

2006-12-08 11:40:08 · answer #9 · answered by confused 3 · 0 1

i think you'll be going the same amount of speed 'cause the flashlight is giving out light instead of allowing you to travel

2006-12-08 07:20:49 · answer #10 · answered by Boeing 777 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers