How can the Lord of the Rings movies Ever compare with J.R.R. Tolkeins The Lord Of The Rings?

Question

I thought the Movies were a waste of time and money, not even a 100th of the words were correct and more than half the scenes were complelty made up out of thin air. It seems they wasted all the time on the movie having walking. How those horror's even got produced is a wonder to me. Please tell me why anyone would waste money on this? Please tell me how these movies could ever get an award? WTF if wrong with main stream idiots today? What happens? Do some geeks just go and say "ohhhh look, Lord of the Rings movies, yuck yuck yuck, HEHEHE, we must watch and enjoy." Jesus, they are already considered cheap fantasy. OMG I AM SO MAD THEY COULD EVER BE COMPARED TO THE BOOKS. WHY ARE PEOPLE SO STUPID?

Answer 1

I thought the opposite. The movies were pretty good, but the books were a bore to read.

Answer 2

Of course there were things left out of the movie. No one would want to see a movie that was 8 hours long or more! I have read the books many times over and I must say I was rather pleased with the movies. Jackson did a great job. The only thing I was upset about in the movie was the casting. I was not happy with the Matrix guy as Elrond and I was not happy with Liv Tyler as Arwen. Overall though, I thought the movies were great, couldnt have been better, but could have been a lot worse! And yes, the books are always better.

One other suggestion; you should waste less time getting angry over trivial things like this and focus your energy on ones that matter, like poverty, literacy, or world hunger or a million other things that could use help and publicity.

Answer 3

Yikes! You may want to calm down a bit. I agree that the movies hardly do the books justice, but many people were exposed to the movies that would never read Tolkein's books.

Every movie/book adaption falls short of the book. There are just too many details in books. Sometimes the director tries hard to come close to the books and sometimes not (Remember Lawnmower Man? That was based on a Stephen King short story, until Stephen King saw the movie!)

It wasn't acurate. It wasnt' exact. But it was the closest thing to Tolkien's intent thus far. And it was better than those Damn cartoons from the 70s! Yuck!

Answer 4

AS one of the hippies in the 60's that help make the books popular the one thing I have to say is" What the he!~! movies did you watch. I thought they were a great, and to this date best movies made base on the books. Tell me have you read the other books he wrote. They go into details that you do not got from the Lord of the Rings. I have read all of his books over 20 times and thought the movies were great. Have you never heard the saying one picture is worth a 1000 words. He pick the right words to use. Get out of your teenage mind set and take a good look.

Answer 5

I've read the books through multiple times, and I've seen the films 2 times each. Personally, the movies captured the epic feel of the work without being overwrought.

I read constantly, anything I can get my hands on, and in my experience, Tolkien tells a great story, but he is long-winded and plodding. In the books, the end of the world is imminent, but there is no sense of urgency. The movies portray this desperation much better than the books. Plus, movies always have to cut scenes out of books for length, and they may also combine different scenes into one to create the end result in a more straightforward fashion.


Oh, and just because you didn't like a movie, doesn't mean everyone who does like it is an idiot.

Answer 6

Some people thought the movies were a disgrace to the books, others thought the movies captured the very essence of the books, most are in between and a few couldnt care less. Your just one person stating his opinion (albeit quite abusively).

All i can say is that the producers of the movies would be quite happy with the money they raked in at the box office, from the amount of people (including you) going to see them.

P.S. However calling people stupid because they have a different opinion to you, does tend to show how stupid you are.

Answer 7

Well, I expect a movie based a in a book I like to be entertaining an true to the book's spirit, if not entirely accurate.
I really liked the movies, and I still love the books. I think they're two different things and should not necessarily be compared to decide which is "better," since there really is no criteria to do that.
If you are a purist, I understand why you wouldn't like the movies, since they definitively are not a word-for-word translation of Tolkien. For my part, I enjoyed most of the changes they made, though not all. Again, they're different products and are not supposed to be interchangeable.

Answer 8

Calm Down! True, the movie cannot be compared to the books but considering how badly Hollywood usually converts books into movies Jackson did a decent job.

Answer 9

Baron Vladomere Harkonan, from the fashioned Dune film, he used to be creepy after I was once younger and noticed it, he is a entirely special creepy now that i've matured. He's a villain who continues on giving! Favorite situational villain, US government in 2001 an area odyssey. It is their insistence on secrecy which triggered HAL to move crazy and begin killing the crew, of course you don't to find this out with out studying the books or looking at 2010... Favorite Villain Orginization, from Get wise, KAOS. It's all in the title.

Answer 10

It is apparant that you know very little of Tolkien's writings let alone the LOTR. Everything in the movies came from somewhere in JRRT's writings. I have traced virtually everyword back to the cannons. A lot was left out but that was due to time constraints. Peter Jackson exercised his director's perogative by moving some of the dialog around and inserting some scenes that didn't occur exactly as portrayed but, again this was to deal with time constaints.

Answer 11

Baron Vladomere Harkonan, from the unique Dune movie, he replaced into creepy even as i replaced into youthful and suggested it, he's a very diverse creepy now that I have matured. he's a villain who keeps on giving! widespread situational villain, US authorities in 2001 an section odyssey. that is their insistence on secrecy which led to HAL to bypass loopy and commence killing the crew, of route you do not discover this out without interpreting the books or gazing 2010... widespread Villain Orginization, from Get sensible, KAOS. this is all interior the call.