Additionally, a full 100% of aborted children said they'd vote Republican, if they'd only been given a chance, of life and the right to choose their own destiny, even if it meant growing up in an orphanage, and being an adoptee to some loving family.
2006-12-08 05:52:24 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
The great (and tragic) irony is that in parroting this "right to choose", the unborn baby, impacted the most from abortion, is given ZERO choice in his/her fate.
I'm sure nearly all of them would choose to live.
Or to paraphrase Reagan, "Those who support abortion have already been born."
________
Kalla wrote: "Did you know, that there are more than 50 thousand children waiting for adoption right now who no one wants because they have special needs, and/or are not white, and/or not infants?"
Actually there are more couples willing to adopt babies than there are babies that can be adopted.
And provide a source to the "50,000" figure.
2006-12-08 05:57:21 · answer #1 · answered by C = JD 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I do not undrstand your question, and your extra part.
Abortion of babies is a woman's right, and there's nothing wrong with having sex, andacciddently making a baby you didnt want, you dont need. Babies are too much trouble alot of the time, and are also a longeterm bother, if you ask me.
Ive had an abortion, and I vote against the stupid Ropublicans, always will too! Babies cant vote, cant make statemennts for a life that wont be any good, anywoays. Go back and try agiain, little baby! its the trashcan for you, and good riddance. And I am finding another guy to f(*(*(* again tonite.
2006-12-08 06:46:03 · answer #2 · answered by Alexi*85 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'd like to know if the fetus would do away with the father as well as the mother - the Immaculate Conception only occurred once.
2006-12-08 06:02:36 · answer #3 · answered by curiousgeorge 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Finally we know how George Bush wins elections.
He counts the votes of aborted fetuses.
2006-12-08 06:08:11 · answer #4 · answered by The Teacher 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not sure where your going with this but had theyd been able to really understand 100% would want to live. Wouldnt you want choice over your own destiny? Contraceptions a choice,babies shouldnt be
2006-12-08 05:56:49 · answer #5 · answered by TrofyWife 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
God-dog, you asked this twice?
Man, you got me worried bout your thinking, all of a sudden.
Need to email me, vent a little, maybe?
I hve always thought you to be a good deep questioner. wtf??
Seriously, I am concerned! First the Steve Bartman question, and now this one? again, too.
something wrong here, and I'm gonna find out what. this is not like you, Ron, your'e like a crazy guy asking this. leave it alone.
2006-12-08 06:35:04 · answer #6 · answered by Aaron 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you know, that there are more than 50 thousand children waiting for adoption right now who no one wants because they have special needs, and/or are not white, and/or not infants?
I also would like to know how you got a poll of all of these aborted fetuses/zygotes/embryos.
MY aborted certainly would never vote republican.
I think you need to rethink how you phrase things, and keep your disgusting propaganda to yourself.
2006-12-08 06:03:22 · answer #7 · answered by Kalla 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
How do you know?
Are you already dead and communicating with the aborted babies now?
2006-12-08 05:58:32 · answer #8 · answered by orange 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your question shows the ignorance of the pro-lifers. Good job and keep posting more questions like this.
2006-12-08 09:11:04 · answer #9 · answered by cynical 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Maybe the baby should have the right to decide whether or not to do away with the mother. What do you think?
2006-12-08 05:59:00 · answer #10 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋