English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Democratic politicians work hard to keep their voting public poor, dependant upon Government for jobs, for welfare, for health care, for cradle to grave protection and care. They are the party of High taxes, the party of government supervision over everyone, in order to facilitate this.
**In over 40 years of Congressional domination, why haven't Dems. corrected even one social problem affecting the poor???

Republicans work hard to keep you safe, to protect marriage, to protect the unborn child, keep taxes low, and promote independance from government, for a sense of self worth, free from the shame of welfare, and the freedom to live straight, gay, or whatever. Lowering taxes, they free employers to hire more ppl.
**This is not in dispute.
**Why don't more people want, desire to become rich Republicans?

2006-12-08 05:40:17 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

12 answers

I'm poor, and I'm to the right of Rush. it would kill me if the government robbed you to "help' me. but then I have character

2006-12-08 05:42:29 · answer #1 · answered by kapute2 5 · 2 0

I think that you're missing the purpose and intent of both the democratic AND the republican parties...both parties are looking out for the good of it's citizens but they go about it in a different way. You also need to look into the details of all the policies that are implemented or endorsed by both parties before you go off spouting smart boy....ie....your comment that republicans endorse the "freedom to live straight, gay, or whatever..." How is it that possible when they are mainly the ones fighting gay rights and such?

pls revise your question so that if you are going to pitch it for debate - you cover all aspects of your arguments rather than just random stuff that you're typing. Your arguments are horrible and you're coming across as very ignorant. It's kind of funny in a sad way.

I'm a democrat but if I was a Republican...I prob wouldn't want you defending my party and it's beliefs..

have a nice day smartie! :)

2006-12-08 09:18:55 · answer #2 · answered by kristina807 5 · 0 0

John Edwards, Kerry the fairy's running mate in '04 is so rich, he won't even talk about how much money he has. The Demorats just want the world to think they are poor. IF evolution were true, they would evolve into Republicans, a higher life form.

2006-12-08 05:57:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

80% of dems in congress are rich, they are all rich pricks who don't give a **** about you or me. They have BOTH sent about ten million jobs oversees over the last two to three decades, they have BOTH been stagnate on raising the minimum wage to keep up with the rising cost of living, and they have BOTH allowed the public education system in this country to become so inept that it has failed an entire generation of Americans.

Where are people like Thomas Jefferson who dissolved large corporations into smaller businesses because he believed that so much power lying in the hands of so few people was undemocratic?

2006-12-08 05:45:16 · answer #4 · answered by billy d 5 · 2 1

I think you are misunderstanding the democrats reasons for policy. they don't want to keep people poor, just help the poor. And I don't think anyone has corrected social problems affecting the poor. Which is more selfish, wanting to become rich, so you can be republican, or helping out those who aren't rich?

2006-12-08 05:53:07 · answer #5 · answered by Take it from Toby 7 · 0 2

Republicans are mostly poor rural people.

It's actually all of rich people in the north east that are democrats.

2006-12-08 05:47:55 · answer #6 · answered by Louis G 6 · 2 0

Because not everyone can be rich! Duh

And Bush is rich because of his family. Same with Paris Hilton.


This past few years, did the Republican Congress even do anything for the poor?

2006-12-08 05:44:43 · answer #7 · answered by Tiny 2 · 1 3

i replaced right into a lifelong Democrat myself, and Democrats are meant to be for all of us having equivalent probability. That being stated, permit me inform you that the Democratic occasion at present has extremely a distinctive time table. they have thrown out equivalent probability in prefer of particular privileges per epidermis colour. they have replaced the thought of unfastened speech with political correctness. they're perpetuating the parable that minorities - extremely blacks - are incapable of competing effectively on the comparable playing field as whites, ala Affirmative action. and that they are pushing the belief of "wealth redistribution", it relatively is predicated on the thought that's unfair for some to have extra effective than others no be counted how tricky they worked to get it. All you will possibly desire to do is pay interest at right here to realize how oftentimes going on that concept is. human beings like Oprah Winfrey are interior the economic strata it relatively is in no way touched with the help of those ideas, because of fact their money is safeguarded in believe money and stale shore money owed - many times Swiss economic employer money owed which our government can no longer even see. i don't know related to the adverse human beings you grew up with, yet permit me inform you that being adverse does not advise you do no longer vote. We observed that this previous election, whilst lots of the adverse have been deceived with the help of Obama's "take from the wealthy and supply to the adverse" platform. What they do no longer comprehend is that the wealthy will in basic terms take their money someplace else, leaving the adverse to pay for Obama's gimmie classes alongside with the middle classification. as far because of fact the government wellbeing plan, why might desire to I might desire to pay severe taxes for wellbeing care i do no longer use? Why might desire to I might desire to pay severe taxes so as that somebody too lazy to apply delivery administration could have one unfastened abortion after yet another? I word which you think of that's incorrect for an coverage organization to make 0.5 a million funds a year. And what does fairness might desire to do with commerce? i'm afraid you defeated your argument with those factors. you truly do think of that's incorrect for human beings to make too lots money, do no longer you?

2016-10-14 06:57:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Check your facts the dems in office have more riches than the reps

2006-12-08 05:48:37 · answer #9 · answered by Deport all ILLEGAL Alien INVADER 3 · 2 1

The horrific stupidity of your post is obvious. It's specious, mendacious, casuistic, opprobrious, spurious, scurrilous, equivocal, apocryphal, vituperative, and, well-----just plain false.

2006-12-08 06:36:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers