English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Some people think that when James Baker presented the study group findings to George W. Bush, he was actually bringing a message from the extended Bush-Republican family.
"Change or face our strongest disapproval, The future of the family, the future of the party is at stake here". We will disavow you and there is no telling what will happen to you.
If Iraq explodes, the middle east may explode, we may loose our middle east allies (The goverments of Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Egypt may fall. America will loose the oil connections, not to speak of our own personal economic connection). The democrats will gain control in 08 and there is no telling how far they will go with the public opinion on their side. This message has the blessing of your father and many of the people that love you and respect you.

2006-12-08 05:16:21 · 8 answers · asked by johnfarber2000 6 in Politics & Government Politics

8 answers

Oh my god that is freaking hilarious. Thank you. That is the best way I have seen it put all day..
Baker was the head lawyer for Bush v. Gore, Baker Botts does handle their middle eastern interests, so..yup consigliere works for me

2006-12-08 05:19:21 · answer #1 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 2 0

Jimmy the mouth piece was a just telling da boss wot the commisiion said , when Snub Nose George learned he just smiled and said forgettabout it!

They me looking for a new chairman for the family

2006-12-08 05:23:42 · answer #2 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 0 0

I think he was put on the commission to give it validity, but I think Baker works for Baker, and his biggest backer may not even be in the USA.

2006-12-08 05:21:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I think that the term is very appropriate for Baker.

2006-12-08 05:21:30 · answer #4 · answered by brian2412 7 · 1 0

I suspect he is higher up the food chain than Bush.

Go big Red Go

2006-12-08 05:21:49 · answer #5 · answered by 43 3 · 1 0

Wasn't he the guy that refused to testify in IRAN CONTRA. And then was forced to so he remained silent throughout the questioning.

What a TEAM PLAYER.

2006-12-08 05:19:59 · answer #6 · answered by elisioloyd 2 · 1 1

No but people that use such terms make me think they are 3 cans short of a six pack.

2006-12-08 05:20:38 · answer #7 · answered by pedohunter1488 4 · 0 2

You very well might be onto something.

2006-12-08 05:18:48 · answer #8 · answered by ROBERT L O 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers