2006-12-08 04:51:34 · 19 answers · asked by montathra 4 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
Adam
2006-12-08 04:52:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The first man created was Adam but the it would have to be the son of Adam to be the first man born into the world
2006-12-08 04:56:28 · answer #2 · answered by sassy! 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The first man 'born in the world'....!
It's sad, but as a result of The Great Flood, all birth certificates and official records were destroyed.
And, latterly, as a result of a union dispute (UnOfficial), the recoding of his testament given to the Press at that time were then lost in the Great Tea Trolley Disaster in 0050 BC, somewhere in the ancient end of the Med.
Sash.
2006-12-08 11:37:29 · answer #3 · answered by sashtou 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
GOD made Adam the first man in the world.
2006-12-08 05:43:48 · answer #4 · answered by rudd_linda 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There wasn't really a first man born. At a certain point, one branch of the simian species evolved to become more man-like, and eventually what we consider homo sapiens developed. Since this was rather a few eons before recorded history, we will never know much about these first homo sapiens other than what we can discover thru their fossilized remains. Were you looking for a name? An address? If so, you're going to be disappointed.
2006-12-08 05:35:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It all starts with the story of creation. God formed Adam. Adam wasn't born, he was created. So the first man born would be Adam and Eve's first son --- Cain.
2006-12-08 04:55:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I advise that you look up the time period "irony." The mythical son Jesus appears like a very good guy, yet he needs to torture human beings continuously. Christianity is a cult that emphasizes a narrative about what occurs when we die -- no matter if we finally end up satisfied continuously or tortured continuously. The mythical tale of Jesus' crucifixion is a terrible, sadistic tale of human sacrifice. Christians actually have a good time it with techniques from ceremoniously eating his blood and eating his body. it is ritual vampirism and cannibalism. the conception of blood sacrifice for vicarious atonement (i.e. the mythical Jesus demise for persons's sins) is immoral -- punishing the chance free to loose the to blame. yet, this is sweet promotion. All good data factors to Jesus Christ being only a fantasy. there's no good data that Jesus even existed, and significant data that he did not. The data is interior the Bible, the different religions of the time, and the shortcoming of writings about Jesus with techniques from historians of the time. the tale of Jesus must be shown to be only a fantasy cobbled mutually out of prophesy and memories from the former testomony and previous gods and myths -- created interior the forties and 50's with techniques from Paul of Tarsus (who exhibited warning signs of epilepsy and had delusions of Christ chatting with him), the different apostles, the unknown authors of the gospels interior the 70's or later, and many persons. The good data for it is overwhelming. For the data, see the links. -
2016-11-30 07:55:10 · answer #7 · answered by coratello 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cain, I think, it could be Abel. Adam wasn't technically born of man. He was born of God.
2006-12-08 12:10:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Adam
2006-12-08 04:53:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Cain because Adam and Eve weren't born, they were created.
2006-12-08 05:01:02 · answer #10 · answered by nettyone2003 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋