This is a bit deep for P&S. People come here to answer questions like "If a shark fought a tiger, who would win?"
But yes, I agree - the profit motive does create a lot of bad mojo.
2006-12-08 07:50:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Athene1710 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good question - deeper than most. I think I largely agree with you. Two examples that spring to mind are premiership football and the environment, particularly with respect to the US car industry. The latter being a little more important than the former, certainly. If things are to change I fear change will be slow. But we do need to redress the balance.
2006-12-08 04:31:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i've got not got faith its the economic equipment in any respect. people who pick to be unethical are many times found out and placed "out of agency" We hear extra approximately this by using mass media right now and the propensity to tell undesirable information. solid information would not sell newspapers or draw people to internet web content as much as undesirable information. i think of it has extra to do with distinctive issues the different writers have stated. susceptible relatives ties, a loss of management and a failure to have faith in a extra suitable authority all make a contribution to adverse determination making. maximum individuals think of there's a constitutional separation of church and state. The shape that I study says no such element. there replaced right into a court docket case that shown the government won't be able to tension a faith on somebody yet this has been twisted from freedom of religion that's certain interior the bill of rights to freedom FROM faith. with out faith, with out solid households, with out solid management, distinctive people lose their way by using fact they don't understand or cant distinguish top from incorrect. individually, i exploit the 6 o'clock information attempt while making a determination. I think of what i'm considering is located out and made public on the 6 o'clock information and everybody I care approximately is interior the room. could i could like my mom, dad, siblings, spouse, babies, acquaintances, pals to understand what i replaced into doing alongside with something of the international? If i would not be proud, i'll compliment another selection.
2016-12-30 03:36:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not really. There are all sorts of regulations that curb the profit motive, such as environmental and workplace safety regulations.
2006-12-08 04:22:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tony M 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Undoubtedly
2006-12-08 04:25:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Xtine 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
a lot of years ago a very stupid government,,,,continued by every goverment since,which hasn't the bottle to say enoughs enough..closed the DPP(director of public prosecutions office)it brought cases against individuals because it was in the public interest to do so...they brought in the CPS(crown prosecution service)instead their remit is to only prosecute if it is Financially Viable...hence they only take cases they can win..makes figures look good and the rest slip the net..
2006-12-08 04:28:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You use all those big words and then you type 'arnt'. You lost me at that point. How much extra effort would it have been to put an e and an apostrophe in?
2006-12-08 04:27:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by fizzy_wolf 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
i feel that as of late the government has manipulated the law to work in favor of this but when it was all laid at at first those eighteenth century yuppies didnt give a **** about the almighty dollar
2006-12-08 04:42:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by frankiebaggodonuts88 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees!
2006-12-08 04:22:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Cleopatra 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
And where does parental responsibilities of raising kids to appreciate morals, values, hard work, honesty, etc. fall into your statement?
2006-12-08 04:22:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by stimply 5
·
1⤊
0⤋