English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Horrible response to Katrina mostly due to reorganization of FEMA and the people appointed to FEMA. The never saw a spending bill they didn't like. Those are two things that come to mind.

2006-12-08 04:21:02 · answer #1 · answered by Truth Erector 3 · 2 0

Global warming is a sensitive issue with the Bush administration. The Bush administration and all Americans should not push for America to lessen greenhouse gases and CO2 emmissions which the Kyoto Protocal has called for. If the U.S. agrees to the framework of Kyoto then all of our industry would be sent overseas to the third world where:
A). Workers will be exploited
B). There will be a loss of American jobs
C). Nothing will be gained because these emmissions are going to be released anyone.
The war in Iraq is a sensitive issue and I feel that the U.S. simply did not send enough troops into Iraq to accomplish their desired goals.
The biggest problem with the Bush administration has been their choice to ban stem-cell research. Stem-cell research can be vital in saving our loved ones lives in the future. The Bush administration are monsters for doing this, and they are irrational for bringing their own Evangelical views into the forefront of American domestic and foreign policies

2006-12-08 04:17:15 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Immigration. I also believe that in an ecosystem as old as the Earth, it's pretty myopic to say that one or two decades predict a permanent global trend, we need to study evidence left in growth rings, sediments, bedrock, historical records, etc. I could make the observation some scientists have about increased solar radiation in space too, causing larger crystal growth in meteorites, more atmospheric storms on Jupiter and Venus, melting polar ice on Mars, etc. Did you know the latest theory on Mercury is that it's outer crust was literally blasted away by a massive solar flare at some point, and this could be the source of the astroid belt? We can blame man and feel good thinking that we can change the end result (although recently they admit it will take at least a century to "reverse the effects of man-made global warming".) Or we can plan now for climate change, which is the one clear fact about the Earth we do have historical proof of, and do what we need to for survival of the human species. I'm not against cutting or stopping pollution or alternative energy, I'm all for it, but I'm not going to slit my own throat while the neighbors pollute as much as they want. I want to survive too. And Bush is getting ignored for what he is 100% right on, we must stop our dependence on foreign oil, ASAP. Getting the whole world to work together for the common good is as likely as controlling volcanic activity, (which has had more climate control than all human activity so far).
On Iraq, I believe the failure was looking at the problem with a Western mindset, instead of predicting the Middle East mindset, I'm not judging right or wrong, I'm saying there is not a gap but a canyon in between, that Bush was too optimistic that people cruelly repressed for decades will not want revenge, as they say: "eye for an eye, and soon the whole world is blind." You can't project your values on a different culture and expect an overnight turn around.

2006-12-08 04:28:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I don't think you can blame either of those entirely on the Bush administration. I think you would be more correct to blame it on the country, because they voted in all the politicians that voted to go to Iraq, and they are the ones causing any pollution or issues that may cause global warming (although I don't think anyone really has the answer as to the real cause of any warming). So, you can point a finger, but I think it is irresponsible and pointless. Let's look forward and get things back on track.

2006-12-08 04:47:26 · answer #4 · answered by straightup 5 · 0 2

He and the administration thought the American people were smarter than what they turned out to be.

2006-12-09 10:09:22 · answer #5 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0 0

You made the claim, now how about backing it up. Just one time I would like a liberal dufus to post proof for their insane crap. Come on troll, just 1 fing link.

2006-12-08 04:14:16 · answer #6 · answered by pedohunter1488 4 · 2 4

According to your delusion "thinking" he caused Katrina

2006-12-08 04:17:22 · answer #7 · answered by John 5 · 2 3

Gee shall we blame President Bush for my water not being hot this morning too?????
How do you know he is wrong????

2006-12-08 04:14:03 · answer #8 · answered by TRUE GRIT 5 · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers