English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Well people think that Lee Harvey Oswald did it... but I'm a little more skeptical.. I think It was the CIA. He supposedly was having an affair with Marilyn Monroe and she died in suspicious circumstances. I want to know what you think. Who did it and why? Also would he have been a good president?? So whatcha think??

2006-12-08 03:52:18 · 15 answers · asked by tori_fan_123 2 in Arts & Humanities History

15 answers

It has to be George W. Bush's fault. Isn't everything else his fault?

2006-12-08 03:54:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think Oswald was one of the shooters, but there is no way he could have gotten that many shots off. Enhanced photographs of the Grassy Knoll do show a man dubbed "Badge Man" just as a puff of smoke is coming out of what looks like a gun. Also, the trajectory of the bullet which killed him seems like it came from a street-level gun--the entry wound would have been through the neck, and the exit wound, which is larger, blew off the back of his head. There is a manhole cover there, and there is a theory that a third man could have been in there. As to who did it, there are all kinds of theories. I have even heard Johnson as even being a possibility. He was extremely powerful in Texas, and he was even present in Texas the night before in a gathering, as testified to by people who were present.

As to being a good president, I think he had more influence as a martyr. In his name, the space program got even more support, and the Great Society programs were implemented.

2006-12-08 04:06:35 · answer #2 · answered by cross-stitch kelly 7 · 1 0

Oh I do like idiots "Oswald did shoot him there's no question". definite there are "Why else could he have left artwork top after the shooting" no one proved he replaced into interior the depository af the time of the shooting He could have left a protracted time in the previous and whether he replaced into interior the construction - why shouldnt he flow away? Or are you announcing - he left artwork subsequently he could desire to be in charge? cos thats somewhat dumb "and replaced into discovered hiding in a theater with a gun which he tried to apply to shoot the police officers that arrested him?" One policemnt stated he replaced into surrendering, yet another stated he tried to shoot him vast distinction the biggest element is at NO time has oswald certainly be shown to have a connection to JFKs killing Even the rifle replaced into no longer proved to belong to oswald It replaced into actual attainable and oswalds fingerprints have been merely recent able which could merely have have been given there while it replaced into dismantled And somewhat stupid - leaving a rifle of a sort you're properly-known to possess, on the real place the place you artwork, with the spent cartridges on the floor, while they could could actual have been accrued and hidden on yet another floor. Even the bullets that killed Tibbett weren't proved to come back from oswalds gun. The shell circumstances on the floor have been (yet spent shell circumstances can come from everywhere), yet no longer the bullets there have been an AWFULL lot of assumptions made approximately oswald, yet there replaced into little or no certainly information.

2016-12-30 03:34:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Well, there are conspiracy thoeries as to who really killed JFK. Some say that it was the CIA or the Mafia. I think that JFK would've been a good president. He would've won his second term in office if he wasn't killed. He did support the Civil Rights movement, too.

2006-12-08 07:59:28 · answer #4 · answered by 3lixir 6 · 0 0

There is no doubt in my mind he was killed by Lee Oswald acting alone and all the conspiracy theories are worth what a bunch of crap is worth. Lee was deranged, manipulated by his own ideologies, hated JFK, wanted to stamp his mark on destiny and this world, he was an excellent marksman and a solitary figure in whom not the FBI, nor the Mob nor the CIA were the least interested. Mr Oliver Stone made a good movie about it but it was only Mr Stone's fantasies and total lack of intellectual honesty. What do you expect from Hollywood ? Personally I refuse to be indoctrinated by those cohorts of bullying film directors who drive Ferrari and tell me lies...

2006-12-08 04:17:08 · answer #5 · answered by Mimi 5 · 0 3

JFK was one of the worst presidents we ever had. I remember him very well. He did nothing, he accomplished nothing. You can make a conspiracy theory out of anything. No, I do believe it was Oswald, acting on his own for whatever private reason. MM died suspiciously? I doubt it. She was a drunk and a dope head. Mix the two.

2006-12-08 04:35:49 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Lee Harvey Oswald was da one but others was there as well they took da shot. they got Marilyn Monroe out of da way there was more then one gun

2006-12-08 04:00:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I say it was the Polish mafia. Prove I am wrong. All these theories years after the fact are a joke. Accept it as it was. BTW: He was president for 3 years.

2006-12-08 03:57:29 · answer #8 · answered by Barkley Hound 7 · 0 0

oh what if his wife ordered a hit on the both of them possible. or maybe he knew something and was about 2 say something very important in his speach but i think the first is more possible kinda funny the bullet missed every1 else but him he wife was right beside him hmm very suspicious

2006-12-08 04:01:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A skeptical person would be a person who refused to believe in something until they saw the evidence of it.

You think it was the CIA. What is your evidence?

2006-12-08 03:55:33 · answer #10 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 1 1

They all did. LBJ's mistress blew the whistle years ago before she died. LBJ and others met secretly the night before. It was a coupe de tat!

2006-12-08 04:11:10 · answer #11 · answered by The Masked Marauder 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers