Is fighting Al Qaeda a reason for staying in Iraq?
2006-12-08 03:11:07 · 11 answers · asked by ? 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Al Quaeda is not a big player in Iraq, so, no fighting them is not a reason to stay.
2006-12-08 06:18:21 · answer #1 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No they won't leave Iraq. They will look at it as a victory. Then over throw the new government that is in place and take over the country. If you want to learn more about this do extensive research and read everything, even if you feel it goes against your belief system. It's the only way to truly learn the extent of a threat the terrorists really are.
2006-12-08 03:22:38 · answer #2 · answered by Mikira 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If we leave Iraq then AQ will work on overthrowing the elected democratic Iraqi government and installing a dictatorship with themselves in charge.
You need to read the translations of AQ documents we have captured. They want to rule Iraq. They also want to punish the Iraqi people for their heresy of electing a democratic government.
If we leave Iraq before they can defend themselves - there will be genocide.
2006-12-08 03:34:28 · answer #3 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
sure, it became into first reported by using ABC information some time past. After the Sept. 11 assaults, Zarqawi returned traveled to Afghanistan and joined Taliban and al-Qaeda warring parties resisting the U.S.-led invasion.[13] He became into allegedly[attribution mandatory] wounded in a U.S. bombardment. He moved to Iran to re-cope with al-Tawhid, his former militant enterprise. interior the summertime of 2002, Zarqawi became into reported[attribution mandatory] to have settled in northern Iraq, the place he joined the Islamist Ansar al-Islam group that fought against the Kurdish-nationalist forces interior the region. He reportedly[attribution mandatory] grew to grow to be a frontrunner interior the group, besides the fact that his management place has not been widespread. in accordance to perspectives on international historic previous and modern-day activities (PWHCE), a not-for-income undertaking based in Melbourne, Australia, "Zarqawi became into properly placed to lead the Islamic wing of the insurgency while the March 2003 invasion happened.
2016-10-17 23:46:20 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you think Al Qaeda was not in Iraq previously then you probably still believe in Santa. Get out of the dreamworld you are living in libs.
2006-12-08 03:19:16 · answer #5 · answered by only p 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
YES! But Al Qaeda is not the only problem.
2006-12-08 03:23:06 · answer #6 · answered by bluedog 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Probably not.
The long-term consequence of our actions in Iraq seem likely to include a new government there that is an Islamic theocracy with strong anti-USA sentiment.
It was a bad idea to begin with, it's been handled poorly, and now there's probably no "good" way to get out of there.
2006-12-08 03:17:13 · answer #7 · answered by Samurai Jack 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Wow. Only P is very uneducated - Saddam hated Al Qaeda and would not let them in his country.
2006-12-08 03:20:05 · answer #8 · answered by Bush = F*cktard 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
no its not the reason but you dont want to hear the reason...
and no they wouldnt leave
2006-12-08 03:15:03 · answer #9 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
And they would go exactly where?
2006-12-08 03:14:25 · answer #10 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋