Do you think that birth control and contraceptives should be more readily available to high schoolers?

Answer 1

I personally think that better education should be more readily available along with them, but YES, absolutely.

When I was in school, there was none of this "just don't have sex" business. I learned everything from clitoral function to impotence, from miscarriages to masturbation, learned about at least fifteen different methods of STD and pregnancy prevention (this included alternate sexual acts other than intercourse), why they were safe, why they weren't, why "pulling out" doesn't work, the percentages of the diaphragm (which I doubt anyone uses now) versus condoms versus the pill versus sponges, creams, gels, and combinations of all.

In my opinion, teenagers get very little in the way of sexual education other than the basics of how the body work, and it seems that questions are turned away.

My neice actually returned from school one afternoon to ask my sister why her health teacher was telling people that condoms cause STDs, not prevent them, trying to discourage condom use - my neices are both very inquisitive, and my sisters and I answer all the questions about sex that she has - as such, she has made INFORMED decisions on how to deal with it.

Once there is better education out there, then we MUST make sure that what is taught is available. I was on birth control pills from the age of 15 - NOT because I was sexually active, but becuase of mood swings and a very haphazard menstrual cycle - these days, I understand that teenage girls with the same issue are being denied the same treatement because doctors and pharmacists seem to think they are too young to be using oral contraceptives.

However, I DO think that contraceptives should be made readily available regardless of the education - preventing teenagers from getting hold of things that can make sex safER is the stupidest thing anyone can do. They're going to do it anyway - at least help them make it safer instead of telling them just not to do it.

People need to wake up, pull their heads out of their rear ends, and realize that NOT teaching these kids is worse for them all around.

Answer 2

Sonali has it precise. 11 12 months previous women, or 13 or 14 12 months previous women for that matter do not only awaken faster or later and be sure to have sex. typically they're molested by older adult males, no longer their center college friends. we are in a state of denial that this does no longer ensue that my uncle, brother, father won't be able to be doing this. the toddlers have nowhere to tutor. in the journey that they tell, they're breaking apart the kinfolk or putting some "promising" youthful guy in penal complicated. remember the flak on the media about the more youthful guy who video taped a fifteen 12 months previous lady having sex with him and different acquaintances of his and how a lengthy penal complicated sentence became unjust? nicely, this guy probable had sex with more beneficial than one underage lady and only were given stuck with this one. And taped it no a lot less. no individual became talking about the damage done to the female. even if she did this willingly might want to no longer enter the talk. She became used, disrespected even willingly this can no longer ensue to one so youthful. similar is going for the boys. they're molested and human beings imagine that they "were given fortunate." So the volatile stereotypes ensue in those situations as well. it truly is yet another manifestation of the societal insanity.

Answer 3

No. It is neither the school's right nor responsibility to hand out birth control. It is strictly up to the parents.

Answer 4

yes, i do, and the reason is that in some states a teenager can get an abortion without the parents consent so y can't they get birth control without having to tell their parents.

Answer 5

yes. GIRLS HAVE OPTIONS!