In order for evidence to be admissible in a court of law, it must be three things, list them.?

Answer 1

1) factual
2) identified
3) disclosed

Answer 2

According to the definition in the Wikipedia Dictionary:

Admissible evidence, in a court of law, is any testimonial, documentary, or tangible evidence that may be introduced to a factfinder--usually a judge or jury--in order to establish or to bolster a point put forth by a party to the proceeding.

In order for evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant, without being prejudicial, and it must have some indicia of reliability.

For evidence to be relevant, it must tend to prove or disprove some fact that is at issue in the proceeding. However, if the utility of this evidence is outweighed by its tendency to cause the factfinder to disapprove of the party it is introduced against for some unrelated reason, it will not be admissible. Furthermore, certain public-policy considerations bar the admission of otherwise relevant evidence.

For evidence to be reliable enough to be admitted, the party proffering the evidence must be able to show that the source of the evidence makes it so. If the evidence is in the form of witness testimony, the party introducing the evidence must lay the groundwork for the credibility of the witness, and his knowledge of the things to which he attests.

See link if you need it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admissible_evidence

Hope this helps.....

God Bless....

Answer 3

In order for evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant, without being prejudicial, and it must have some indicia of reliability.

Answer 4

1. Doing your own homework
2. Not asking people to do your homework
3. Doing your own homework