Why is the Iraq Study Group posturing that they want withdrawal when they want continued occupation for oil?

Question

It's discussed openly in Great Britain under Tony Blair who wants his final trip to the Middle East to call for British access to Iraqi oil.

In the US, the public has been kept in the dark.

Once you read the report and listen to Bill Gates, you realize that they are proposing being in Iraq for "quite some time". .

The withdrawal is talking about a certain part of the forces, but it's not clear how, who or whether it's being characterized properly.

They continue to urge privatization of the oil industry. They want to orchestrate the use of police.

The Washington Post and CNN when they say it's a call to change course now-- have gotten it all wrong. This the is will of NEOCONS to create another kind of madness for oil.

Why has the press invested so much in the Iraq Study Group which is a tool of the Bush Administration?

This is NOT the will of the American Voters. 58% of American voters want ALL troops withdrawn 77% want withdrawal NOW and 68 percent of Americans want NO PERMANENT BASES IN IRAQ.

Sorry, fmr CIA chief "Robert" Gates

Answer 1

The Bushies just want us to THINK we're considering withdrawal. He needs us to stay there until his regime is over. It's like a man who's cheating on his wife...he keeps leading his mistress to think that he's leaving even though he has no intention. The rest of the free world knows that we're there to secure the Iraqi oil fields for his business partners in Saudi Arabia and for the Carlyle interests in the region. The reason we've created a quagmire is so we can stay there, indefinitely. Soon as the Saudis have secured pipelines and been able to extract as much as possible, we will then begin to pull out before the next administration gets in and is able to uncover the ruse. I know it seems like these guys are completely incompetent...but in this case, it's all deliberate.

Answer 2

Typical politics. Each group here in the US wants to slam the other group for not doing the "right" thing. It's called "partisan politics". If the invasion has been a great success and everything worked, the democrats would be been talking about how THEY allowed Bush to do all of this.

Answer 3

sure because of the fact we did not pass into Iraq for oil. We have been made to have confidence Iraq had WMD's because of the fact Saddam became into petrified of Iran attacking him so he became into keen to roll the cube not assuming we'd finished out invade yet purely bomb him like we had executed interior the previous. And he had used WMD's in the previous while he killed thousands of the Kurds while he gassed them, so i might say to those that mentioned he on no account had them to pass ask the relatives of people who lost relatives on the palms of his regime.

Answer 4

I think the Iraqi Study Group does want withdrawal.

Answer 5

Your poll numbers are way off and your facts distorted. Maybe from watching CNN and the Post. You sound like a liberal groupie who feeds you what they want you to think and so you do.

Answer 6

Where have the Iraq Surrender Group said that they want "occupation for oil"? Please show us exactly where it says, hints, or implies this because I suspect you're pulling it from somewhere (not your mind).

Answer 7

The better question is - why don't you stop sniffing glue and posting your useless drivel on this site?

Answer 8

So where is all this "oil" that you liberals keep harping about?

Answer 9

Why don't you read it all again and try to understand it.?