English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Since Brit-Brit's wild antics, partying every night, flashing her private areas, now who do you think is worthy of sole custody? I think Fed-Ex all the way. He'll have nothing but time on his hands and he'll do a better job than her. If she raises them, you'll see two little Michael Jackos running around with all types of issues ;-)

2006-12-08 01:39:20 · 12 answers · asked by Leo 2 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

12 answers

I think they'd be better off with Britney. I dont think she meant for things to get that way. Shes been married and tied down with family life for alittle while and I can understand her feel of freedom during her 25th birthday. Wearing no panties, I mean even some normal people go comando but there arent any cameras around non-famous people to catch it. She made some mistakes, and I bet that some non-famous mothers can say they've made some mistakes too and wanted to feel alittle freedom sometimes. I honestly dont think Kevin can be a stay at home daddy, she partly left him for his going out, and partying stuff. He may love his kids but I dont think he'll give up going out with his boys. I think he doesnt pay child support for his kids with Shar. He may be a good person but that doesnt make a person a good daddy.

2006-12-08 03:38:20 · answer #1 · answered by Jess 5 · 0 0

I agree, I don't really see him as the best fit but he damn sure is better than her at the rate she is going. You are so right about the MJs running around, how sad. Hopefully he is on his best behavior and his lawyer is taking notes about Brit antics. I'm figuring Brit think she would win because she has the most money but hopefully they don't get a judge who is that shallow and thinks money makes a better parent--I think someone more responsible need to raise the kids like the Nanny maybe?

2006-12-08 01:46:23 · answer #2 · answered by Kia 5 · 0 0

She is just having some post divorce fun. He, on the other hand, was out partying every night while they were married. Also, he has two kids by another woman! It would take a lot more than some prying by the paparazzi to cause K-Fed to get custody.

As in, she would have to be driving drunk, with the kids in the car, for him to get custody!

2006-12-08 01:49:55 · answer #3 · answered by Tony M 7 · 0 0

no he has been partying more then she has he's just not that news worthy. She has been pregant for the last two years and everytime she goes out people are in her face. So let her have some fun.
Kevin left his first two children with out a thought and now he wants the two with Britney. Yeah that's not love that I want your money. He walked away from the first two just do the same with these. He wa behind on support anyway.

2006-12-08 01:52:29 · answer #4 · answered by sarah b 3 · 0 1

I have to say that I agree with you. I used to think "Yay for Brit, she dumped the gold-digger!!" But, you don't see photos of him out partying all night, flashing what he shouldn't be. You know those photos will come back to haunt Britney in court. For her camp to be saying how she's being a doting mom now and for the public to see these pics of her running wild is sort of a contradiction of terms.

2006-12-08 01:44:53 · answer #5 · answered by metalmom71 3 · 1 0

I personally think that what she is doing has been blown way out of proportion......I am by no means a fan but there are lots of women who do not wear underwear....does that make them unfit to be a mother? There are also lots of women who go out and party, with the kind of money she has I am sure those children have someone watching them when mom is out playing. The only reason Fed-Ex wants them is for a paycheck, he walked out on his pregnant girlfriend for greener pastures, what has changed that makes him the better parent.........I think she is young and very foolish, when you get a man who is a cheater and a deadbeat what do you expect the end result to be.....she will learn, give her time...

2006-12-08 01:57:54 · answer #6 · answered by ??whome 2 · 0 1

IMO, neither one of them are worthy of sole custody. Those kids need to be put up for adoption so a family who knows what their doing.

Fed-Ex doesn't even take care of his older two kids yet all of a sudden he wants sole custody of his two youngest ones?

Then Britney has turned herself into the trailor park trash version of Paris Hilton and doesn't seem to care that she just had a baby like 5 weeks ago. She's too busy becoming Paris Hilton's little spawn of dirtyness.

I'm sure that those little boys have become more comfortable with their nanny than with either one of their parents.

2006-12-08 01:47:24 · answer #7 · answered by DaleJr#1Girl 4 · 1 2

I would have to disagree. Kevin can't even take care of his first two kids. What makes you think that he will take care of Sean and Jayden? Britney is a great mother to her kids, just because she has kids...... that doesn't mean she's a monk. If you had photographers following you around all day, everyday, then they're bound to catch some imperfections.

2006-12-08 03:04:12 · answer #8 · answered by chastonn b 2 · 0 0

What is so wrong with Paris. I dont see a problem with Britney being friends with Paris. And with the kids Britney will get the kids no matter what. If you dont like what I say then **** You All!!!

2006-12-08 04:58:14 · answer #9 · answered by jessica c 4 · 0 1

your probably right but they're both stupid and incompetant. its just that Britney happens to be more incompetant than K-Fed, although that might be debatable since K-Fed isn't scheduled to come back from Looneyland for a while. it's painful to even think about his music.

have a nice day :-)

2006-12-08 01:44:00 · answer #10 · answered by Cayleen O 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers