is Mr. Bush U.S.A president a bad man and a killer?

Answer 1

I don't know about him being a bad man, but he is definitely a bad president...

Answer 2

We as citizens can't go as far as to say. We only see the outside image. The news media says one thing, and than we hear another what is their to believe? Back in September of 2001. No one knew what was going to happen, right? Wrong! It was about 2 weeks before the attacks actually happend. A document "The Phoenix Memo" was sent to Condoleeza Rice's office. She never read this document. When she was questioned on national T.V. she told the questioner to shut up. Do you believe it? No matter. In the 1960's the president wanted to go to war with Cuba however, their wasn't any reason to go to war. So, the President devised a plan called, "Operation Northwoods." This plan clearly states their would be an attack on U.S. soil, by the U.S. military and then blame it on Cuba to go to war with Cuba. When Presidnet Bush first came into office he wanted to go to war if Afghanstan, and Iraq. What better way to do it than by creating a terroist attack, and blameing it on Terrorists? Still don't believe? Well, here is a site for ya. http://www.geocities.com/killtown/ If any of this is true...I really feel sorry for the families that lost.

Answer 3

He is the president of the most powerful and civilized (!) nation of the world. How could he be a bad man???

He is not a killer. The Iraqi men and women are terrorists, even the kids! So if he kill them that doesn't matter. Only the Americans have the right to live with security.

Why God? Why? Why do you created us??? Weren't the Americans enough??? They want to rule the world, why don't you let them???

Answer 4

Without question I suggest he is inept, and likely shouldn't have been elected, but he is also in a situation where BAD advice seems the best he can get, and decisions aren't always, strictly in his immediate control. He's also in a job that many want, but can't handle once they get it. Consider "The Peter Principle"

I didn't vote for him, nor would I,,, as well, I will not vote for his brother who happens to govern the state I live in currently, who will most certainly try to remain in politics on some higher level.

Please consider this also. The "WAR" if it can be accurately defined as such, isn't something to dismiss of course, but regard those in combat with respect if nothing else. They're just doing a job they've been ordered to do, and they too give up lives in defense of some principals they may not agree with.

I'll assume you are not a USA citizen, no offense, and certainly you and/or anyone else who takes what any MEDIA trys to feed the population, as "Gospel" needs a more defined reality check.

No matter the causes, there are NO winners in any WAR, and it seems that in a Democracy, even those who do a civic duty by voting, aren't always happy with the final count and result of any election.

Steven Wolf

Answer 5

As far as killer goes I guess you could look at the amount of people that were executed while he was govoner of Texas.
A bad man? Well I suppose you could concider the Military Commissions Act of 2006 a particularly bad piece of legislature, and for him to sign it under the guise of it being a good thing then yes... he is a bad man.

Answer 6

Absolutely not! The man is trying to decure the safety of all nations and humans. You obviously are looking at the current situation through the eyes of the liberal news media. They only report the bas things that happen, well insurgents in Iraq have been killing each other for thousands of years. It is not President Bush's fault that they want to kill each other.

Answer 7

Mr. Bush, was pushed into a corner eight months into his presidency...He has done what he needs to do. He has freed nations that were under horrible siege for decades...he has caught a man who destroyed thousands of his own people in the eighties, with serin gas, as an experiment to 'see if it worked'...I remember when they found three thousand gas masks and suits in an abandoned hospital..so the weapons of Mass d are in Syria...why did Clinton let the weapons inspectors be b.s.'ed into not doing their jobs for year while he hid them..please, this president will go down in history while liberals all over the place out of their ignorant jealousy spew hatred all over the media, in a time of war. They should all be arrested for treason...the men and women who are over there now, went willingly...and deserve the ut most respect for keeping us safe...I am going to laugh, when all the lib's who are running congress, put in a draft...then you can thank them for 'loving you' as they blame the Bush administration for that one too. I don't care what any liberal thinks of me right now. There isn't one of you who will actually look at my comments ;'liberally'...which is what is so amazing about today's so ciallistic liberal types...The President will go down in history as being one of the Best,..although he will never get credit for it now...So come on liberals, make my day...the thumbs down box is vacant. at least for now.....The fact that 'no weapons were found' makes me laugh. Use your heads...if S. H. destroyed his own people for an experiment clear back then...do you think he was satisfied with that? Of course not...he hid them for future referrence...Mr. Bush should not have to be exposed to the garbage in the media during war. This never would have happened years ago...This makes our country appear even more weak and full of traitors...Of course, with me, the bottom line is that Jesus is reigning anyway, and God will soon end all of it..but you asked about Bush, and that is my opinon...which, according to liberal standards, I am supposed to have.

Answer 8

Some might say so... I personally feel he is just a misguided person who really cannot handle the immense issues a President faces. Nevertheless, as far as his character is concerned, I think he has made some bad choices, but with good intentions.

Answer 9

He trips old ladies, eats baked plump puppies, pulls wings off flies, and tortures little children. He's very bad.

Answer 10

He is a poor leader, and a pathetic excuse for a president. I doubt that history will judge him kindly. As for his merits as a human being and if he is a murderer, only the one on high knows that for sure. One thing is for certain, he will get his comeuppance.