English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

how would guys react if God placed them in the situation of having to bear children instead of women for say, a decade?

2006-12-07 22:52:44 · 17 answers · asked by Reb Da Rebel 6 in Pregnancy & Parenting Pregnancy

17 answers

well,.. for one thing, we would get to whine and moan to our wives and expect them to lie to us when we ask them questions like "does this make me look fat" and stuff

We would probably be a lot more against our sons being premiscuos at a young age, more so than pehaps our daughters

ALthough,. the impracticality of this is,.. where the hell is the baby going to come out? Our asses? cuz if a guy passed it throught the other whole,.. I guaruntee hes one tough SOB,lol

I sense a lot of angry woman energy coming in these awnsers here,lol.... All I can say is, its hard to believe that so many of you feel that way about guys,... of course,.. my mother taught me to respect women and so I do. I have always said child birth would suck. At the same token though,.. I think if men had to deal with childbirth,.. they would adapt,.. I mean,.. obviously woman were left without a choice and thus able to cope right? Why not the same for men?... Isn't ripping on guys and belittling them the same thing many of you are complaining about guys doing in your anwsers, and isn't that just perpetuating the nasty cycle you guys are so upset with?

I've seen both men and woman who have had to deal with extreme amounts of pain and both sexes seem to hold up well. I think pains a non issue here.

*covers his head* (as he anticipates an all out assault from the rest of the female respndants)

2006-12-07 23:04:35 · answer #1 · answered by Z 5 · 1 2

That's a good laugh! There's no way a man could handle the hormonal changes which take place during the 9 months of pregnancy, the difficulty breathing as you get further along, and the sleepless nights, not to mention the pain. I've often said, all men should have to pass a kidney stone - a LARGE one at that! Then they can just begin to fathom what it's like to have a baby. The only part of it they would enjoy is having lactating breasts!!!

I do know for sure that the population count would decrease dramatically!

2006-12-07 23:07:12 · answer #2 · answered by Nicole 3 · 1 0

I could not put into words the possible reactions it may cause. I could not imagine as well how the process would be but as long as you mentioned it will be assigned by God, then no further question on it. I would suggest however that it could possibly be according to human choice depending on varied individual situations.

Male pregnancy is still in its experimental stage though successful impregnation of male individual was said to exist.Mr. Lee was mentioned as the first human subject to attempt this. http://www.malepregnancy.com/science/ procedure

Science gives possibility of male pregnancy by powers of hormones and using the procedures of In vitro fertilization techniques and delivery by Cesarean section. The possibility of womb transplant in the future is also given hope.

All what science can do, I believe would be useful according to individual circumstances. Assuming it will become not a matter of choice in the future decade as you are trying to speculate, I bet the number of celibate would increase a bit but I highly expect that there will be a skyrocketing of condom sales. There is also a forseeable increase of popularity of Vasectomy.

"As God placed them in the situation", as you mentioned, I imagine it is supposed to be through normal process. HOW is it suppose to happen and WHAT processes will be involved?

Anyway, men will be sorry for being male in such situation. But they will adopt to it naturally as time goes by and life will go on just the same.☺

2006-12-07 23:40:58 · answer #3 · answered by ♥ lani s 7 · 3 0

There would be no babies for that decade, after one had one that would be it! He probably would die from the pain because no man would be able to handle that, thus the reason women have the children.

2006-12-07 23:10:14 · answer #4 · answered by lisads1973 3 · 1 0

I think the male suicide rate would go way up, and the poplulation would go way down, because men (even though they wont admit it) are huge babies. Theres no way they'd be able to handle the pain. and even if they made it through that, they'd be all possessive over the baby after it was born. I think thats why God made it so women have the babies. We handle pain way better and we dont have the "its mine!!!!!!" attitude.

2006-12-07 22:57:04 · answer #5 · answered by Dani 7 · 1 0

We would ***** and moan about everything, go shopping with our friends everyday, have showers and get gifts for baby, have the women do every little household chore, then cuss you in the delivery room.

2006-12-07 22:57:16 · answer #6 · answered by Buster 3 · 0 0

I'd be like "haha suckers!" and would be greatful after the decade was over because they would probably respect women like they SHOULD!!!

2006-12-07 23:00:05 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 1 0

for ten years, we wouldn't have a population explosion... in fact after 50 years we would start becoming extinct and after 100 years, the human race would have completely died out.

2006-12-07 22:58:06 · answer #8 · answered by tampico 6 · 0 0

The population of the worlds would drop DRASTICALLY.

And chances are there'd be a rise in the murder rate too!!

2006-12-07 23:29:56 · answer #9 · answered by Maddy 5 · 1 0

We definitely wouldnt have the problem of over population. I seriously dont think they could handle it.

2006-12-07 22:57:49 · answer #10 · answered by pebbles 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers