English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-07 22:33:55 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

38 answers

I don't think even barrymore knows himself. The dead man was seriously sexually assaulted before he ended up in the pool, and there was evidence of lots of drink and drugs at the party.

its a case of waking up thinking 'what the hell did I get up to last night' and finding a body in your pool.

I doubt anyone will ever know for sure

2006-12-07 22:46:35 · answer #1 · answered by Corneilius 7 · 0 0

Hi there,

No,I do not think he is.
Obviously I haven't been to that party where that pure guy lost his life in the swimming-pool,but Barrymore would not carriage an other police investigation if he was guilty,isn't it right?
He said himself the fact that they give an other go to find out the truth is for everybody's sake,including for the young man's father.
Although it could be a trick...

All the best:
B.

2006-12-07 22:44:36 · answer #2 · answered by amerika 2 · 0 0

The biggest difficulty the police face is that Barrymore takes great delight in telling television he will do anything to help,but when interviewed he will say nothing.The same would appear to apply to the other people at the party who all seem to suffer memory loss.

2006-12-08 00:12:18 · answer #3 · answered by geoff t 4 · 0 0

no idea - I wasnt at the party.

I would say that the guy who died must have been quite odd to have gone back to a private party with a bunch of hard living gay guys - it would have been obvious they were all serious party people and wouldnt be going back to chill out with a glass of wine and debate the state of the economy. I do think its a tragedy but people have to take responsibility for themselves. There was no women invited to the party - its a bit of a giveaway as to what the plan is in that situation.

2006-12-07 23:48:30 · answer #4 · answered by Saucy B 6 · 0 0

The truth does not always come out, and what is decided in a court of law is not always based on what actually happened.

I think he's guilty of being an c**t........... as for the death of Stuart Lubbock, we might get a few more facts, but I doubt we'll ever find out the real truth.

2006-12-07 22:47:16 · answer #5 · answered by Vinni and beer 7 · 0 0

Guilty.

2006-12-07 22:36:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Don't know if he's guilty or what crime he could be guilty of.

I do know he has never come forward and tried to give any explanation what happened that night, not even to the victims family.

He is a coward.

2006-12-08 00:31:06 · answer #7 · answered by madnesscon 4 · 0 0

Guilty of what? He hasn't been charged of anything.

And innocent until proved guilty in a court of law (as opposed to tabloid newspaper).

2006-12-08 06:41:53 · answer #8 · answered by DanRSN 6 · 0 0

do you actualy have any evidence to suggest he is? So some bloke was found dead in his pool at a party with loadsa people. The bloke was tripping anyway plus if he was pushed it coulda been anyone.

Innocent until proven guilty

2006-12-07 22:37:02 · answer #9 · answered by england til i die 3 · 1 0

HE know's more than he is telling. Why hold information back if you are not guilty and have nothing to hide?

The truth will out, it always does.

2006-12-08 08:39:23 · answer #10 · answered by Chey 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers