2006-12-07 16:36:12 · 14 answers · asked by Grace 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
This question has been around since the intellegence of mankind was awakened. Did we evolve from lesser Primates? I think not. If we did there would surely be NO monkeys or Apes left, they would be US. I do however think that evolution and creation exist together. The "Big Bang" theory would have more credibility if they could somehow show that Nothing Creates Something. What caused the "Big Bang"? Every action has an equal reaction. Yet If nothing existed before, there is No action and NO reaction. There is a very simple test to prove creation. Place a rock on your desk. Wait for said rock to move on its own will. Without outside intervention the rock will NOT move. That my friends is scientific proof! Please explain the "Big Bang" theory to me again.
2006-12-07 17:39:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we evolved but new scientific evidence has shown that our evolution did not start on this planet that our origin is from another planet and that somehow we or our origin species came here and then in time we evolved. I clearly think some species of man on earth has evolved from breeding from others but the original species has not evolved. So maybe some of us are Aliens and some are not. The ones that are not are still human and yet their genetics have a difference, big difference in cases of immunities. The DNA is one thing but the inherited genetics is another separate issue when divided it is a complexity that scientists cannot explain why some people from certain genetics have stronger livers and others are being born with no gall bladders and appendix. That is not a birth defect it is called evolution in these noted cases. You can research about the liver studies on-line go to the University of Minnesota site.
Or check through the scientific studies under livers,gall bladders, etc. on a medical site.
2006-12-07 16:59:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not taking any issue here either way, I personally believe God would be smart enough to know how to handle thing by either creation or evolution, but the religious right has corrupted the theory or evolution with their spin on it. Darwin stated that all life forms evolved from a lower similar life form through genetic mutation and preferential breading of the species. His proposal stated that all homo-sapiens, apes and humans, evolved from a distant relative and that if the genetic line of a species was traced back far enough all similar species, i.e. mammals, would have some where in the prehistoric past a common ancestor. Humans didn't evolve from monkeys according to evolutions, humans and apes evolved from different branches of the same genetic line.
2016-05-23 05:40:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Creationists have some old poetic books to produce as evidence and Evolutionists some 300 years of corroborated evidence - from fossil records to the tectonic of plaques to DNA, enough to fill many swimming pools... When I hear people putting the two "theories" on the same footing I don't know if I should laugh or cry.
At the end of the day, everyone should be free to think what they want if it makes them feel better. But we shouldn't pollute our kids' brains: superstitious storytelling and objective reasoning are NOT the same thing.
2006-12-07 17:10:46 · answer #4 · answered by imprology 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In the beginning, the universe was created. This made a lot of people very angry, and was widely considered to be a bad idea. - Douglas Adams
Personally, I can live with any theory. I am here, in any case. And I am grateful to however that came about.
2006-12-07 16:45:30 · answer #5 · answered by Lorenzo Steed 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The God is unknown materialistic thing.
At first He took “clay” and made a figure of a man
and only after He gave him a “soul”.
How can we understand this scientific?
==============
1.
The “clay” is a proton.
2.
The “soul” is a quantum of light / electron.
3.
Interaction between proton and electron is created
simplest atom - atom of hydrogen.
4.
And atom is alive design.
The atom of hydrogen lives 12 minutes.
5.
After is created a complex atom.
6.
The evolution is continuing.
7.
And someone a long time ago has already said, that if
to give suffices time to atom of hydrogen, he will turn into Man.
=====================
http://www.socratus.com
================
2006-12-07 16:58:28 · answer #6 · answered by socratus 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
My own theory is that the fossils don't lie and weren't placed there by evil paleontologists, athropoligists and assorted rock hounds to advance their careers....in other words the fossils don't lie, so the debate is over.
2006-12-07 18:32:57 · answer #7 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I haven't decided yet. Both creationism and evolution have huge holes in terms of physical evidence.
2006-12-07 16:39:19 · answer #8 · answered by Brandon 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
All of this modern scientific proof these guys are so dedicated to, guess who created them.
2006-12-07 19:22:40 · answer #9 · answered by ohn D272727 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ahura Mazda created us.
2006-12-07 17:40:10 · answer #10 · answered by evil in all its forms 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋