How do you think the US government would be affected by switching to a multiparty system?

Question

A multiparty system as opposed to a two-party. I'm brainstorming some ideas for an essay, and I'm curious as to what you all think. Pros? Cons?

Thanks in advance!

Morons who plan on posting idiot comments that aren't actually answers: don't bother wasting your time.

I KNOW we have multiple parties, but in effect, it's a two-party system because there are only two parties that have a chance of winning. And I'm not proposing a switch, so you don't have to go about asking how I plan to do such a thing. I'm asking what you think WOULD happen, hence use of the word "would" in the question.

Answer 1

There are countries that we should certainly switch with. Tiny countries have tens of parties while we have only 2 dominant ones. While there is libertarian and green party many of them do not have much support. It would certainly bring new ideas to the way this country can be run, but at the same time it could create even more bickering. 2 parties right now fight over so much, it would be interesting to see how much fighting would occur if there were 3 or 4 or more dominant parties.

Answer 2

What you need is someone with big money to come in and get a third party rolling. So they can keep up with the negative compaign ads the other two parties will be throwing their way when they figure out what a threat this third party will be etc.
With the major two party system you have people who take side because one side is more in tune with their believe system then the other. So what ever party will need to have strong opionions on issues. One key issue that is not decided at this point is illegal immigration. That would be a great stand to start the ball rolling for a the third party. The third party would have to be anti!

Answer 3

It would be great to just have a viable third party in this country. It would give people who have become frustrated with our current two party system a option. I wouldn't want to have 5 -10 parties, things could become too fragmented. Four viable parties would be a good position for us. But we have been around quite awhile and there are only two viable parties, so I don't know what the future will bring.

Answer 4

Well, it might be a good idea, but there already are other parties, they just don't go around fighting like the two major ones do. I would much rather see one united party. Just my feelings.

It reminds me of a song " The one in the middle is on the right and the one on the left in between."
So true, too. All I want to be is a patriotic. American with hopes of never having another civil war. Mutiparty system may just create more mud slinging, or it might help. Good idea and I hope you are sucessful

As to your exact answer you want, I would say the US Government would be even more confused.

Answer 5

of course having more choices is a good thing. however, Americans haven't grasped this concept except when it comes to cars, fast-food restaurants, and contestants on American Idol. When it comes to politics, they still only like to have two choices. Since the USA hasn't figured out the obvious advantage of having more parties for 230 years, I see no reason why they will ever figure it out. Also, having more parties makes it more difficult to place all your hate onto just one party which is what Americans LOVE to do now.

Answer 6

You have been lied to. The payroll tax and those classes have been touted via politicians as being "off funds" and "have confidence money" yet those have been bald-confronted lies. what's extra they have been prevalent as bald-confronted lies for some years, yet many pols keep telling them. certainly, those are tax & spend entitlement application no diverse from any others. a guy a decade or 2 in the past tried to sue the government for SS reward he knew he will possibly under no circumstances assemble because of the fact it replaced right into a "have confidence fund" that implied possession of the money. He lost. The courts shown that those are basically tax & spend classes like numerous different tax & spend application. (replace in reaction on your replace) definite, you have been promised that. YOU ... have been ... LIED ... TO. the money replaced into spent on even though beef challenge congress wanted to fund that three hundred and sixty 5 days. In substitute, they gave the SS administration US Treasury Bonds. This action is exactly comparable to you emptying your economic business enterprise account, spending it on strippers and beer, and leaving your self an IOU for the quantity withdrawn. Then, ten years later, once you desire that money, attempting to leverage that IOU to your self which you under no circumstances paid back. Congress has had ALOT of strippers and beer over the years. perhaps I pushed the metaphor to a approaches?

Answer 7

Anything to decentralize the power from the Democrats and the Republicans would be a huge step foreword. The smartest President seems to be the first President Washington who warned us about the evils of political parties and foreign entanglements.

Answer 8

We have multiple parties. It's just that there are only 2 with enough support to matter. How would you engineer this "switch"? force people to support other parties?