I say we bring back lyinching for child molesters. It will set an example.
First you chop their nuts off with a cheese grater. Than you chop off all their limbs. Then you hang them.
And broadcast it on Pay per view
Plus it would only happen with damnable dna evidence.
2006-12-07 15:13:24 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Psychology
I think they should be lynched, because when I was younger some pervert tried to molest my two younger brothers.
2006-12-07 15:28:20 · update #1
Yes, all sex offenders, including child molesters, should be executed.
But, we should do it the way the House of Israel did it, with the execution done immediately, in public, and being done by the victim's family and the witnesses to the crime.
Sexual deviance is in the mind, not the genitals, so castration doesn't work.
Prison doesn't work, for that unnatural environment reinforces criminal behavior.
Further, incarcerated sex offenders continue to pose a threat to society because they escape or get paroled.
Like a previous respondent to this question, I too, was a victim.
Let's protect the children and the families.
2006-12-07 15:32:13 · answer #1 · answered by John Robert Mallernee 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
the problem with it extremely is in common words 0.5 the molesters may be hanged, as women human beings many times do not get done, in spite of what they do. A Missouri woman molested 5 boys at the same time as HIV useful. All she may be charged with became sex with a minor. She doesn't even might want to sign in. no longer in common words that, if no ones unearths out, women those who get pregnant by the boys can wait 7 years, than be provided retroactive baby help adverse to the male. As for the castration comments, how may you castrate a lady?
2016-11-24 22:18:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think child molesters should be given a fair trial. Upon conviction they get the letter "P" (for pervert) tattooed on their forehead. Then place them in the general population in prison. Do you know how many cons were molested when they were children? Do you know how many cons have children of their own? I don't think that a known child molester would have a very enjoyable time in the joint. Hanging is too quick, let the cons make him suffer.
2006-12-07 15:22:50 · answer #3 · answered by maxinebootie 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, however they should be locked up for life at the very least. Possibly the death penalty, although personally I'd reserve that for when they murdered the kid. What you're advocating is referred to in my country as "cruel and unusual punishment" and there are very good reasons why it is forbidden here.
2006-12-07 15:19:33 · answer #4 · answered by Point7Q 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No hanging is too good just let them live with the cut off nuts and cut off limbs
2006-12-07 15:24:20 · answer #5 · answered by Lolitta 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If you was elected as one of the members of the board they would boot you off in a hurry.
2006-12-07 15:17:43 · answer #6 · answered by JoJoBa 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think any "A" Felony with DNA proof should be killed within 24 hours of verdict
2006-12-07 15:22:47 · answer #7 · answered by ML 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
coming from a 17 year old who was molested, yes I think they should be lynched.
2006-12-07 15:16:47 · answer #8 · answered by llllllllll 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Well, the medieval aspects of your idea are a bit over the top, but I would vote for castration.
2006-12-07 15:21:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
We try to be a nation of laws, not of men, because of men like you.
2006-12-07 15:16:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋