English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

18 answers

Not unless he is Impeached or tried in the World Court. Many have most of the pieces of the puzzle, but it is difficult to have them all. Oil, the prnc agenda, muscle the middle east, plunder, no bid contracts for Halliburton, etc. But the big boys hide in the shadows, and unless you are sharing brandy and cigars with them you can't get the whole picture.

2006-12-07 15:06:10 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 4 5

There is much speculation.I think it was a combination of the Neo Con's dream of a New World Order and wanting to line the pockets of himself and his Big Business cronies, as we all know certain people have made billions of dollars off the war while the American People have paid for it with lives, and our Tax dollars.. I assume one day there will be someone who digs up all the facts and the American People will eventually know the whole truth. I only hope it doesn't come to late to prosecute them in a court of law.

2006-12-07 15:12:03 · answer #2 · answered by wisdomforfools 6 · 3 1

Secret Service Agent: "We've just been attacked by terrorists Mr. president"
Bush: "From which country?"
SSA: "Afghanistan"
Bush: "Did you just say Iraq?"
SSA: "No"
Bush: "Yes you did. Iraq it is"

2006-12-07 15:33:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Personally I'd like to know when individuals like you are going to give it up???? It is PRESIDENT Bush, he did not lie to get into Iraq, and will be out of office in two years. Relax.

2006-12-07 15:14:50 · answer #4 · answered by rosi l 5 · 1 4

I dont think he lied. I believe that there were WMDs in Iraq but with all the media gives away, Saddam had plenty of time to get rid of them or at least hide them thoroughly. Sure, we can all agree that Bush is an idiot, but that doesnt mean that he lied. I bet he was just as surprised was we were when we found no WMDs. I garuntee that Saddam had them, but gave them away at the last minute.

2006-12-07 15:07:51 · answer #5 · answered by druszka717 3 · 4 5

will we ever know how many licks it takes to get to the center of a Tootsie roll lollipop

2006-12-07 15:07:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 7 0

I'd say he'd have to lie before we could find out reasons behind it

2006-12-07 16:02:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

The President didn't lie. If one acts on information provided by others, it is not a "lie", even if that information turns out to be inaccurate. Perhaps you should purchase a dictionary.

2006-12-07 15:10:35 · answer #8 · answered by Rick N 3 · 2 4

He did not lie. The people who twist this war and its stories for their own gain are to blame for your perceived opinion.

2006-12-07 15:14:42 · answer #9 · answered by 19K Army 1 · 2 3

I want to know who has the facts that he lied - I hear it alot but all I've seen is media spin.The oil thing is so old he has nothing to do with OPEC and pricing get a life -and impeached for what show some intelligence.

2006-12-07 15:05:40 · answer #10 · answered by josh m 5 · 4 6

fedest.com, questions and answers