I have a hard time seeing the guy taking anything seriously other than his sacred early bedtime. What's he afraid of happening if he stayed up past 9 pm? Would the drunk or coke urges be unstoppable? We need a change and it's not the dick waiting in the wings.
2006-12-07 15:16:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why could anybody take it heavily. that is not something greater suitable than political conceal for the two the Democrat celebration and the Republicans. What does this panel of "experts" understand from sitting interior the fairway zone that protection rigidity commanders on the floor do not understand? the respond is obviously not something. What adventure does this panel have with the specific subject in Iraq? the respond right that's clearly not something. Its a humorous tale.
2016-10-17 23:25:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
ISG... a group commissioned by a Republican congress... led by a prominent Republican member of two ex-Republican presidents' offices...
they are clearly such a bunch of liberals...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Study_Group
eventually Republicans are going to be calling Reagan a liberal if this keeps up...
2006-12-07 15:04:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Read all the questions and his answers from the press conference.
His flippant "It's bad in Iraq. Does that help?" remark isn't a fair representation of what all he said about Baker-Hamilton
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/12/20061207-1.html
2006-12-07 15:03:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Seems like Bush is being offered a life preserver in a "way forward in Iraq" -- a mess so complex that there may be no graceful resolution. It may be that regional war can't be avoided.
But President Bush seems to be unwilling to grab the life line offered him. Such arrogance!
2006-12-07 15:09:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by murphy 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Can you see any one with an ounce of sense taking the word of the lawyer of the Saudi royal family in anything haveing to do with war, terrorism, oil, or any combination there of?
2006-12-07 15:03:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Koolaid Kid 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He certainly has nothing left to lose. Not that the war's been affecting him much, personally. How many of his close relatives are in Baghdad...? At least, compared to the number of investors who took those no-bid contracts in the rebuilding effort?
That smirk, thankfully, has been seen less and less in recent years. :)
2006-12-07 14:58:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Who could take that report seriously. Rush calls it a "dull pile of steaming nothing".
As usual, Limbaugh is right.
2006-12-07 15:03:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by cornbread 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
He doesn't even listen to his military advisors so no, he isn't going to take it seriously.
2006-12-07 16:30:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Patricia 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Are you talking about the Independent Surrender Group? Why should he when they themselves said that they did not even consider victory. Weak spined liberals are killing this country.
2006-12-07 15:01:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
2⤋