Ronald Reagan, Dwight Eisenhower, Theodore Roosevelt, Abraham Linclon?
2006-12-07 14:49:34 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Compared to Reagan: Dumber, if possible, and a lot eviler.
Compared to Eisenhower: MUCH dumber, totally evil and with no military experience.
Compared to Teddy: MUCH MUCH dumber, not as good a hunter, not as good a horseman.
Compared to Lincoln: No comparison. Bush isn't fit to clean Lincoln's Depends with his tongue.
2006-12-07 14:54:18 · answer #1 · answered by Bryce 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
At the bottom of the list, lower than that even.
Actually, you've pretty much got them in reverse order as to importance: Lincoln, Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Reagan, Big Bird, Barney, Oscar The Grouch, Cookie Monster, Bush.
2006-12-07 15:29:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Oh Ronnie....no comparison at the least...I'm not a republican but however I did like him...Bush cannot be compared to Ronnie although he might think he can. Ronald stood what he believed in and didn't take no guff from no one.Dwight was before my time didn't know the man personally..lol but what I have heard no comparrison. Roosevelt...hmmm not a man to cross a man with integrity Bush is not. Abraham Lincoln was a good man the best there was in his time. He made up his mind and got results, firm believer....Bush is not.Not too many good things to say, His Dad was better than him thats not too good. No comparrison.
2006-12-07 15:09:09 · answer #3 · answered by shuggabhugga05 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I didn't like Reagan, but he at least knew when to cut your losses (Beruit). Eisenhower was a pretty moderate guy in deed if not ideology, Roosevelt and Lincoln are not at all Republican in the way we use the term now. That's like comparing apples and oranges. Still, they were better. Lincoln could be stubborn, but he adapted to changing situations, and didn't deny reality. And Roosevelt was practically the first President to use "realpolitik".
2006-12-07 15:00:18 · answer #4 · answered by Chance20_m 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush comes in a distant last, and so will history record that he has been the worst President ever. How embarrassing for him, especially as everyone, including daddy, seem to be distancing themselves from him. He must feel set up. Maybe he should now change parties and try to do good with the rest of his term as a way of getting back at those who have left him to stand there all alone.
2006-12-07 15:02:39 · answer #5 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
This became into abuse of skill, which became into not something new to the Bush/Cheney regime. i think of the unlawful conflict in Iraq, the wiretapping of yank telephones with out FISA courtroom approval, the torture of detainees in violation of the Geneve convention and of the form which the Oath of workplace demands a President and vp to uphold, the tried coup the Bush/Cheney administration tried to hold on (the overthrow of our democracy for a fundamentalist theocracy), and the trip by using Cheney/Bush of a CIA operative's id and cover enterprise call IN WARTIME (an act of treason) have been all lots worse in terms of unlawful acts with unfavorable long- and short-selection effects.
2016-10-17 23:25:37 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Better than Eisenhower. TR I'm not sure. Lincoln was better. As of right now a would say Reagan was better, but history may change that.
2006-12-07 14:52:49 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
You should be ashamed to even mention his name in the same breath as those other great men. Bush is, has been and will forever be a national disgrace.
2006-12-07 14:53:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Bush has perfected or perverted the art of republicanism
2006-12-07 14:53:42 · answer #9 · answered by dstr 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Reagan was the greatest and Bush fits amongst the others quit nicely.
2006-12-07 14:53:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋