How is diversity weakens a nation? History homework question?

Answer 1

Races differ in innate behavior patterns, in much the same way that different kinds of birds do. That's what Thomas Jefferson was getting at when he said that two races, even if they were commensurate to each other, all things considered, probably could not coexist under the same government. The laws that govern one race well often govern another poorly. Each country should have only one race in it (apart diplomatic embassies), so that all the races can have the laws that govern them best.

Mixing it up was a ******** idea from the start. History teaches many, many lessons to the effect that racial diversity heralds social, economic and political collapse. From the fall of Ancient Egypt in the 7th century BC to the fall of the Roman Empire in the 5th century AD, to the disintegration of the United States of America, which is going on right now, there never has been a nation or an empire that has survived "mixing it up" for long.

If diversity weakens a nation, then why do nations do it? They do it because influential groups desire cheap labor, or because they hope to use the inevitable racial tensions for some other purpose. They use bribery or intimidation, or some combination of "carrot and stick" inducements, to make the elected officials use their offices in ways contrary to the best interests of the people who elected them. The media might expose these corrupt goings-on, but if the subversive group also controls the media, then the public will have no means by which to understand the trouble that the traitors are putting them in.

A Jewish communist, in London, said:

"We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the ***** minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the ******. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the ***** will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause."

- "A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century," by Israel Cohen, published in 1912. Quoted by the US government in "The Congressional Record," volume 103, page 8559, June 7, 1957.

Subversive influential groups manufacture a great many lies extolling the "advantages" of race mixing. It's all a load of nonsense. If there really were such advantages, then all through history racially mixed nations would have been conquering racially pure nations, instead of the other way around, and this "diversity" business would have been the norm throughout the ages. It wasn't.

Answer 2

Immigrants into a nation that refuse to relinquish their ties to the former country and continue to, and support, adhere to the old country's social norms weaken a nation. For example, lets say that Hispanics eventually achieve a majority of the population of California and chose to use spanish as the primary language. Will this weaken or strengthen the nation? Now lets assume that the spanish speaking inhabitants vote to return CA to Mexico or become independent. Will that weaken the nation?
People that immigrate do so for many reasons but those that refuse to adapt or insist on significant social changes in the new country are not a positive influence.

Answer 3

demographically? Diveristy does nothing but strengthen a nation. A foolish nation would only allow a certain race to live in it. It certainly would not last very long. There are a lot of talents and things people can offer.

I'd recheck that question to make sure it is really asking that.

Answer 4

Homework You are on newspaper!
http://www.osoq.com/funstuff/extra/extra01.asp?strName=Homework

Answer 5

jenab6 is right. That's the best answer.