Classic moment when a powerless President in made to admit things are bad in Iraq after ISG report in Press Conference.
2006-12-07 13:58:19 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush will tell the truth to British reporters but thinks that the American people do not deserve to know the truth. That's why he lies to us all the time and some a**holes said that clinton lied
2006-12-07 14:03:47 · answer #1 · answered by roy40372 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
It's part of Daddy's plan to keep the hounds away. Junior was playing hard to get until the very last moment (the end of the Republican CONgress) so that it will look like he's under pressure from the Democrats and the people.
We all know it's a show, and any future decisions and policy changes will be much less significant than the media will print at the behest of the White House.
If you want Change, keep it in your pocket. Your dollar is the life you sold to buy crap you don't need.
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Nov05/Carpenter1102.htm
2006-12-07 22:04:30 · answer #2 · answered by auntiegrav 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
you people are idiots. BUSH NEVER SAID THAT. you took the statement completely out of context. Everyone else has also taken the ISG OUT CONTEXT. I suggest you read the report for yourself before commenting on something you havent seen yourself. Besides, never believe a british news agency. They lie worse than MSNBC and CNN combined
2006-12-07 22:49:42 · answer #3 · answered by quarterback 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Because the American White House press corps are a bunch of spineless wimps. Where are Walter Cronkite and Edward R.Murrow when you need them?
2006-12-07 22:42:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
British Journalist love reporting in America. England does not enjoy the same freedom of speech that we have. In England they can not report speculations only resolved news.
Rahks Bad man how mut planer cand I put it. I I visit with ta famblies idz bad.
Go big Red Go
2006-12-07 22:11:32 · answer #5 · answered by 43 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush never wanted to admit his mistake but now it is getting painfully obvious to everyone except many of the people in this site. Of course now if we are happy he tells the truth they will probably acuse us of wishing the war to go bad and more deaths. It never ceases to amaze me how the rhetoric runs the policies.
2006-12-07 22:21:27 · answer #6 · answered by cosmiccastaway 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Wow, you have admitted that he admitted. Does that mean you will stop asking why he didn't? No? That's what I thought.
2006-12-07 22:33:05 · answer #7 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
WTF is wrong with you? It sounds like you are happy to know the US is losing in Iraq. Do you want more ppl to die? Because if the US leaves, the terrorists are going to take Iraq's oil, and sell it to russia for weapons. I have no doubt in my mind that, that is exactly what will happen
2006-12-07 22:01:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Because British News has the same creditability of a supermarket tabloid and cannot be trusted for truth. So that means it is not true.
2006-12-07 22:02:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Because the american media are cowards
2006-12-08 02:10:00 · answer #10 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋