2006-12-07 13:00:02 · 9 answers · asked by blahblahblah 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
HE HAD TO HAVE BEEN.
2006-12-07 13:31:32 · answer #1 · answered by kayla s 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not. Two reasons: He liked doing a movie with kids and it is his job and a celebrity will take any chance on earning cash
2006-12-07 13:10:00 · answer #2 · answered by tintanboi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so..it was alright i guess..but he said he wanted to make a movie where his nieces and nephews could see what he does
2006-12-07 14:50:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, but i guess he wasn't making much movies that year, so desperate times call for desperate measures. anyways, he's not a good actor.
2006-12-07 13:08:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because on tv he said it was a real fun movie to make/ i mean why would he be embarressed
2006-12-07 13:02:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gotta pay the bills one way or another.
2006-12-07 13:02:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He should've been, but he probably wasn't.
2006-12-07 13:07:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no - it was something different
2006-12-07 13:55:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
2006-12-07 13:03:32 · answer #9 · answered by Mimi 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋