OR Church's or Popeyes, I think they still had Pioneer back then.
2006-12-07 11:45:08 · 11 answers · asked by norhollywud 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Jagrmeister?! THATS FUNNY BWAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHA
2006-12-07 12:03:17 · update #1
No I danced liked D love yo. I was dancing while eating a drumstick and dribbling a basketball.
2006-12-07 12:04:55 · update #2
you go Lolita!
2006-12-07 12:07:47 · update #3
HELL YEAH - 2 sodas - 2 orders of chicken spicy
2006-12-07 12:03:29 · answer #1 · answered by Lolitta 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Rants of an imbecile- tsk tsk. When OJ was found not guilty I was in class being that I was in high school. I was very disappointed in the verdict being that I feel he is guilty. I don’t eat fried foods or drink soda so no I did not eat KFC or drink grape soda. And your stereotypes show your intelligence. Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
Good Evening
2006-12-07 12:04:34 · answer #2 · answered by Roni 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Didn't celebrate. OJ has always maintained his innocence and a great portion of his recent book is probably defending himself against false allegations. Here's a few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later was heard on tapes played in court making extreme racist statements about blacks and then committed PERJURY regarding his racist comments (used "N" word 42 times).
- The chief investigator of the entire case admitted in court that he took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scenes.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see the rumored large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
Likely the jury found him "not guilty" because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to say with absolute certainty that this man is guilty.
Read this:
http://members.aol.com/CntrbndMag/oj.html
One of the World's top forensics scientists Dr. Henry Lee who worked on the case during the trial and saw the evidence, wrote a very good book "Cracking Cases" and makes some interesting scientific points about OJ not being the one who did this unfortunate crime.
2006-12-07 16:01:43 · answer #3 · answered by sunshine25 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
two decades to existence in reformatory. 2 of the felonies he grow to be convicted of have been those concerning using a damaging weapon in cost of against the regulation. That immediately doubles the sentence. for each offense. And this "gun enhancement" regulation additionally places him able the place he will could do 70% of his adjudged sentence earlier his parole listening to. The media crowd who descended on our Clark County interior of sight Justice center do not seem to comprehend that. we've some difficult rules in the Silver State. which incorporates getting existence without parole for sexual molestation of a minor. some years in the past a financial employer vp from Northern California made the blunders of molesting some youthful boys. His mistake grow to be making use of his summer season place in Minden. he's doing 40 2 existence without parole sentences back to back.
2016-12-13 04:50:29 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but I was in middle school at the time living in Hawaii. We were riding the bus to school at the time and listening for the results on the radio. When they stated the verdict "Not Guilty", the whole bus went into cheers...
: )
2006-12-07 11:49:02 · answer #5 · answered by ♥michele♥ 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I am black, I did not celebrate but I was surprised. Many white people celebrated also, what did you do cry like a little "B" and probable got on your computer to express your dis-like for a certain race instead of facing off you Lil chump lol thanks for the 2 points stupid
2006-12-07 11:58:44 · answer #6 · answered by MR.D LOVE 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yo! I just moved to this new area and these btches don't have a KFC. Whats up with that? And naw I did not celebrate cuz that cat is guilty. But I did watch white people cry into their glasses of jagermeister. They all cried and hugged one another very gayly as whites are apt to do.
2006-12-07 11:56:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
I celebrated with poutine and Pepsi
2006-12-07 11:51:03 · answer #8 · answered by Glen Quagmire 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope~ didnt celebrate ~didnt care if he was guilty or not!~ sorry! ~i might of had pizza that night but i always ate pizza~
2006-12-07 11:49:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, I'm not Black, so, no, I didn't celebrate with those culinary delights! In fact, I didn't celebrate at all, because the scumbag was GUILTY!
2006-12-07 11:50:49 · answer #10 · answered by toobland21 1 · 1⤊ 5⤋