Macbeth evolves into the archetype villian. By the plays end, Macduff, as the loyal family man and brave warrior, is Macbeth's shining opposite. Write a comparison of these two men, using evidence from the play to support.
2006-12-07 11:34:47 · 4 answers · asked by west07rebel 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Homework Help
Duffman Cannot Die, Only the Actors who play him!
2006-12-07 11:36:13 · answer #1 · answered by hey2a 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The comparison between MacDuff and MacBeth is easy, as Macduff came from a long line of refreshment quaffing dullards, whereas MacBeth rarely quaffed or committed dullardness. Also, MacBeth was substantially homlier in a beautiful way, while MacDuff was inclined toward beastiality and other recreational pursuits. As MacDuff was the owner of a 1937 Packard, MacBeth could hardly see his way clear to walking through the drive through on his weekly foray into the metropolis of Dallas, and sought to steer the great roadship toward a pickup window tended by wenches with a penchant for asking about fries with that. MacDuff was of the MacDonalds clan, and the BKing knew that there would be issues if they ever met with the lovely Lady Wendy or her famous chili. I'm really hoping you'll just copy and paste this into your report. Shakesphere knew all along that both MacDuff and MacBeth would survive an eternity in literature, and they would be the subject of many comparisons such as these.
Good luck.
2006-12-07 11:44:25 · answer #2 · answered by Stuart 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Macduff is additionally seen dependable to the king, as we see Macduff mourn the shortcoming of his king ("O horror, horror, horror! Tongue nor coronary heart/ won't be able to conceive nor call thee! … maximum sacrilegious homicide hath broke ope/ The Lord's anointed temple, and stole thence/ The existence o' the development!" (2.3) extra effective than we see the king's very own son mourn him. He brings Malcolm with him - possibly exhibiting his loyalty for Scotland's up-and-coming ruler (is additionally taken as an illustration of loyalty to the king, as he's keeping the overdue king's son in doing so). he's dependable to his family contributors additionally - while he's in soreness after coming to grips with the death of his kinfolk, whilst Malcolm tells him 'Dispute it like a guy,' he states 'I shall gain this; yet i could additionally experience it as a guy" (and avenges them). Malcolm additionally tests Macduff via pretending that he would be a worse king than Macbeth (see their communicate in Act IV, Scene III), Macduff threatens to desert his usa - this certainly has the choice result, because it replaced into all a try to reasons Malcolm to word Macduff's integrity and carry to him - whilst this might certainly make it seem as though Macduff *isn't* dependable to his usa, it does teach that when the chips are down, Macduff is the guy you prefer to have on your component - he's particularly much incorruptible and dependable to the forces of stable. possibly proving that Macduff can't be corrupted may well be extra handy, yet i will see how that could desire to slot in with being dependable.
2016-12-11 04:29:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why dont you try reading the play yourself
2006-12-07 11:36:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋