Any 9/11 Truthers Here?

Question

I am a 911 Truther, I need help from others truthers to vote on a story at www.digg.com to help get it on the home page to wake up 100's of thousands of skeptics, It will only take a couple minutes of your time.

Im me on yahoo: war_on_terror_is_a_scam

AIM: Sleepy2k16 and ill give u the link, thanks

Answer 1

I am a truther also. And the terrorists attacked 9/11 and that is the truth.

Answer 2

The Pentagon is a fort! actually. The towers weren't equipped to stand up to an attack from a miles off places unit. The Pentagon replaced into equipped to stand up to a brilliant attack on it. it relatively is a fort. So ... confident there's a brilliant wingspan to a Boeing 757 besides the shown fact that it hasn't the skill of a strategic missile equipped to wreck. So the Pentagon replaced into able to stand up to the result much extra suitable than the rest. the only photos we've of the hit got here from a automobile park because of attitude and process the attack of the Jet. we can't view it from the different secure practices digital camera's around the Pentagon. As for the wreckage? extra effective than in all probability they have what's left of it in storage. that's info and that's protection stress info so that's whereabouts might desire to no longer be marketed. you know how secretive the Pentagon is.

Answer 3

Yes, I know the truth. Terrorists took jets and crashed them into buildings to kill the infidel. Osama later takes credit on camera. Case closed.

Answer 4

There you are! I've been looking all over for you. It's time for you to take your pills, sweetie.

Answer 5

911 conspiracy theory lies too. Would you like examples?

Some bloggers and 911 theorists say hijackers are found alive and links to BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well.’ What they don’t say is that this BBC article is about confusion over hijackers’ true identities. It appears hijackers may have assumed someone else's IDs. Criminals using false IDs? Hard to believe? BBC article ends by saying “FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.” That’s why the title put quotation mark around ‘suspects’ when it says ‘suspects alive and well.’

You can read this BBC entire article here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm
You’ll notice in the middle of this BBC article titled ‘Hijack 'suspects' alive and well’ it also says in bold face ‘Mistaken Identity.’ Conspiracy gurus never even finished the entire article it appears and have reading comprehension of sixth grader.

Twin towers never fell at free fall speed as Professor Jones claims. He makes eye ball estimate and do not make actual measurements. Several have made calculations showing the towers fell close to free fall because of massive kinetic energy, but frame by frame calculation shows it does not fall at ‘free fall’ speed. You can actually see some debris falling faster than building is collapsing in some footages.

Building 7 had a giant hole stretching over 10 floors and its picture exists, but conspiracy theorists probably don't want you to see since it dampens their 'demolition' theory. See the photo here. http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm Conspiracy theorists do not discuss this massive structural damage, but talk about ‘pull’ quote that is very vague and arbitrary. Why would Silverstein, who is not familiar with demolition at all, use demolition slang to admit something so odd on national TV? That doesn’t make sense.

911 conspiracy theory claim Rumsfeld said flight 93 was shot down. On 9-11-01 it is Cheney who mistakenly believes 2 planes were shot down by Airforce during the attacks. Cheney have ordered to take down any hijacked planes that may be heading for a target after WTC was hit. Rumsfeld tells Cheney he knows one plane is down, but can’t confirm who brought down the plane (flight 93). This episode was explained in PBS’s Frontline: Dark Side. They had obtained actual transcript of their conversation. You can see this transcript here http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/view/ Cheney/Rumsfeld conversation is shown in ‘part one’ at beginning of documentary.

Rumsfeld was in Pentagon when it was hit and helped rescue crew which was caught on video. Why would he or others order missile to hit it when they're in the building. Several light poles at near by high way were knocked down short ways from Pentagon. Did single missile swerve around in chasing after skinny light poles before hitting pentagon? Was it a big fat Tomahawk missile that is wide as commercial airliner’s wing span? http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0274.shtml
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

Many claim Pentagon had auto missile defense that could have shot down planes entering its airspace, but such project really never took full effect because of fear that civilian plane may be shot down and might pose danger to neighboring residents. Can you imagine some newly licensed pilot flying single engine Cessna into Pentagon air space getting shot down by missile or anti aircraft guns? Richard Clarke, former counter-terrorism official explained this. Ask him about it. How many times do you see planes go off course by accident? Gov officials didn’t want to endanger its own citizens for extremely unlikely scenario.

Some claim debunking911 websites are debunked and links to infowar website, but there they only discuss ‘pull’ comment again which is very vague and arbitrary and they do not discuss other countless flaws in 911 conspiracy theory. They do not explain the fact that many experts have explained ‘molten metals’ and several structural engineers and experts have disputed Steve Jones’s (physicist and not structural engineer) theory.

Debunking911 websites were never debunked, because 911 theorists never explained why things in debunking911 websites are wrong. There are just too many odd assumptions in these 911 theories. 911 theorists do engage in what we now call ‘cherry picking of information’ in order to complete their picture of reality.

Why would government kill 3000 of it own citizens to make case for a war when they can just generate evidence of WMD using intelligence which is so much easier? The US went to war without UN Security Council clearance anyways. If we can go to war whenever we want to why kill 3000 people? Just for the fun?

Answer 6

Why would the US attack itself? Stop skipping classes and go to church or something-you could use it.

Answer 7

more nuts than a squirrel

Answer 8

This is not a question.