English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Just give me your personal opinion.

2006-12-07 09:55:09 · 6 answers · asked by J.B. 1 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

6 answers

I feel smoking bans go way too far. It takes away the rights of all the business owners. If I own a house, pay my bills and taxes for my house, I, the homeowner, gets to decide if people smoke in My house or not. But I guess the business owners who pay their bills and taxes don't get to decide if people can smoke in their business or not. Here's a simple solution: you force a business to put a sign on their door informing the public whether or not the place is smoking or non-smoking. Then, you let the public decide whether they want to spend their money there or not. And the employees who don't want to be exposed to secondhand smoke can decide if they want to work there or not. That way, the business owners and the public both keep their rights. Everybody wins.

2006-12-13 22:15:41 · answer #1 · answered by MRewak 3 · 0 0

Not all Public places !

2006-12-07 18:00:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think so because those who do not smoke dont like to smell like smoke. Or breathe smoke. Whereas if you do want to smoke, that is fine, but dont do it in an enclosed space.

2006-12-07 17:59:00 · answer #3 · answered by Mo 4 · 0 0

smoking should be allowed as long as industrial stacks can emit smoke into my air. I also believe a proprieter of an establishment should be able to set his/her own rules about smoking within.

2006-12-07 18:02:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Absolutely. People can smoke if they want to, but I don't want to be forced to breathe it.

2006-12-07 17:58:47 · answer #5 · answered by trancegoddess2001 3 · 0 0

YES!!

2006-12-07 17:57:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers