I'm currently in the process of looking for a used car. I have a specific budget that won't allow me to buy low miles less than 3 years old car.
As such, I'm trying to weight the pros and cons of buys a car with either. 1: Low miles older vintage say 6 years and older.
2: High mileage buy say 3 years and newer.
From what I can gather, wear and tear caused buy usage, high miles, 75K or more is probably harder on a car than age.
However, I don't know how old a low mileage car can be before it becomes a reliability problem.
I'm looking at a 2000 Toyota Avalon with 29k miles. If the car is in good/excellent condition, can I expect it to be reliable for several years to come? Or is a high miles 75K 2003 Avalon a better bet?
2006-12-07
09:41:09
·
6 answers
·
asked by
PanamaMike
2
in
Cars & Transportation
➔ Maintenance & Repairs
I've read a few of the answers and I appreciate them. It looks like most can't resist the how the car was treated variable.
Lets say both cars were well cared for. The 2000 is a granny kept car. Someone with money that just drives the car to the store and back, gets a car every 6 or so years.
The second higher miles car is from a dealer. I figure from the age/miles ratio that the car was probably driven with highway miles.
I will try to get a mechanic to take a look at the car, but because of the very good condition of the Granny car, I may be forced to make a decision without having a mechnic look at it due to others having interest in the car.
This has already happened with another car I was considering.
2006-12-07
11:03:17 ·
update #1