Before the release, every one said the only people who would buy the Wii are the die-hard geeky nintendo fan-boys. Well It's been released, and so far all the Parents, New gamers, younger kids, teens, adults, along with the Nintendo fans perfer the Wii. It seems to me the only people here who recommned the PS3, and the even smaller group, Xbox 360, are the die hard geeky msoft/sony fan-boys. Which bring me to my first questions, If the 360 where released along with the others (with out the major head start) do you really think it would have done as well? And two, for those who say they aren't geeky fanboys, can you give me any reasons why the ps3/360 are better (other than graphics, since who gives a dang how it looks if it ain't fun, and specific games, since thats what a GF looks for) Finally, to my astonishment when I read the January GamePro mag, I was surprised to only find two commercials for wii games, and 0 Wii reviews. Why do you think they still don't show nintindo E stuff?
2006-12-07
09:15:56
·
4 answers
·
asked by
FeelNFine
4
in
Games & Recreation
➔ Video & Online Games
You said:yes the 360 would have won because it has better: graphics, {see original post} online multiplayer, {so does wii} CONTROLERS (wii controlers r stupid, cough,cough) {and less complicated, attracting a wider audiance} and it has games like halo 3(ROCK ON) {see original post}coming out, so that is why the 360 is better. The wii is just plain stupid to the max level because it was built for little mario and Kirby(DIE,DIE,DIE) fans who dont want to get exposed to "violence" {yeah, games like red steel aren't violent} so the ps3 is better there, but 360 is still the best for your money's worth.
As to your mario and kirby comment, it's called appealing to a wide variaty of customers. Wii has exiting games, along with E games like that, where as the 360 focuses on on genre, with tons of FPSs, the E games being sports.
2006-12-07
09:49:32 ·
update #1