He refused to serve his duty in Vietnam (a useless proxy war against the "oh so dangerous commies), but sends over 100,000 soldiers to Iraq (a useless proxy war against the "oh so dangerous Muslims").
2006-12-07 08:36:39 · 15 answers · asked by Bush = F*cktard 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
So B, I assume that means you possess too little intelligence to actually formulate an answer to this question? I am not a Democrat, either. I just realize how much of a fool Bush is.
2006-12-07 08:42:49 · update #1
And I am on welfare because my household income is around $500,000 per year? Or is it because I have a $400,000 dollar house and drive a Lexus? Please tell me.
2006-12-07 08:43:50 · update #2
Finally an intelligent question... Yes that does seem somewhat hypocritical. But when you think about it, he didn't dodge his way out of going because of a principal or some moral standing, he did it because he could and he didn't feel like going to 'Nam. So in a sense that's more like holding a grudge for too long, and then deciding to do the same thing with his position of power to vent. So it sorta isn't hypocrisy.
2006-12-07 08:57:37 · answer #1 · answered by Rick R 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only part of your criticism that I have is your use of "oh so dangerous commies and oh so dangerous Muslims" comment.
Any armed enemy is a danger and threat.
Bush as well as any other Politician is a hypocrite. They have to be. Some like being hypocritical more than others.
2006-12-07 16:41:53 · answer #2 · answered by JohnRingold 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes he could but then he would have to give up nap time.
Him, Cheney and Rove feel that his current hypocrisy level is just fine and they have all agreed he will stay the course.
2006-12-07 16:55:48 · answer #3 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Stop trying to mislead those who don't know better.
That is a bold faced lie. Your ignorance is what will lead this country to its end. Have a good life, you miserable piece of ****!
2006-12-07 16:41:39 · answer #4 · answered by only p 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Like the demowhimps are?
2006-12-07 17:23:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
oh my gosh! STFU! Wow i hate how democrats think there better than everyone else just because there on welfare. Jeeze, get the picture. People with money are better.
Democrats= poor sh*tless losers.
2006-12-07 16:40:53 · answer #6 · answered by asdfghjk; 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
When did he "refuse" to go to Nam? Back up your accusations with facts, sir.
2006-12-07 16:41:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Remember, he's AGAINST nation building, budget deficits, activist courts, and illegal immigration.
2006-12-07 16:43:03 · answer #8 · answered by Poop Hole 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
an education would do you some good my friend.
the answer is yes, because he is no hypocrite, and no bill clinton.
2006-12-07 16:42:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not as much as some terrorist with a computer
2006-12-07 16:41:48 · answer #10 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋