2006-12-07 08:27:31 · 19 answers · asked by Bush = F*cktard 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
None of the above.
The joke are those on YA that ask stupid questions! Yes, that would be you!
2006-12-07 08:29:56 · answer #1 · answered by LadySable 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Well, Bush said "You know, one of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror," so I'm inclined to go with foreign policy.
Then again, he also said, "I've reminded the prime minister—the American people, Mr. Prime Minister, over the past months that it was not always a given that the United States and America would have a close relationship," which tends to indicate domestic policy.
I don't know. It's all such a huge, huge f*cking joke. It's tough to parse.
2006-12-07 08:37:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would have to say Bush's supporters.... because a man can be a joke in the real world.. but his supporters are the ones that put him in the spotlight... if there weren't any supporters maybe some more US troops would be alive right now and we would've stopped at Afganistan and possibly have caught Bin Laden.
2006-12-07 08:33:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Excellent question- but tough, too... Hmmmm.... It's a toss-up between Cheney and Bush supporters... No-no- It's his foreign policy... Oh I just can't decide!
NEWS FLASH! Bush has been sighted in a white Bronco heading toward the Mexican border, screaming "Just build the wall behind me!" to the illegals.
2006-12-07 08:31:58 · answer #4 · answered by Not so looney afterall 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
enable's see: below Bush/Cheney, a brilliant number of the international hated us. What goodwill there became into in direction of us after 9/11 became into right away diminished by using the regulations of Bush. below purely the beginning up of Obama/Biden, the international's opinion of our u . s . has long gone up markedly. greater suitable than one u . s . has mentioned to us "welcome back," meaning that they neglected the previous u . s ., which became right into a pal to different countries. So interior the long-term, which will shop us safer: A coverage by using which a brilliant number of the international hates us, or a coverage the place a brilliant number of the international likes us?
2016-10-17 23:04:16 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Don't make me choose - they're all jokes! Bush probably has more experience as a joke though, going back to the days when he was Governor of Texas.
2006-12-07 08:35:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The joke is on us. We, as a nation, allowed them to hijack our highest office without any real protest whatsoever.
Six years later...
You oughta change your ID. It's the type of thing a Hannity, Coulter, or Limbaugh might do.
2006-12-07 08:32:31 · answer #7 · answered by LatexSolarBeef 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush himself. He is a phony tough guy. How tough was he back in the 60's when he could have served his country in Viet Nam, but made sure his daddy used his influence to make sure he didn't. He's a chicken.
2006-12-07 08:33:57 · answer #8 · answered by Pop D 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
None are a joke. Just bad news.
2006-12-07 08:36:06 · answer #9 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush supporters.
Totally denial of any and all reality.
"Iraq is going swell"
"Bush be so smart"
etc.
2006-12-07 08:31:54 · answer #10 · answered by cannon Ball! 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Actually no matter how stupid any of those are, none of them are a joke because they are the ones in control of our government.
2006-12-07 08:36:02 · answer #11 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋