A couple of rules
-The questions aren't known in advance
-The issues cannot contain illogical political points such as the minimum wage and flag burning
-An actual answer has to be given, not simply pointing out what the other person lacks
2006-12-07 08:16:55 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush is not a debater that's obvious, quit being obvious. It doesn't take the captain of the debate team to run a country. It takes a man who can surround himself with bright people and can make the tough decisions, that you are not able to make. Leave the man alone, let him do his job, you'll be rid of him soon enough.
2006-12-07 08:21:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
some are memories, and some are authentic. the perfect situation to do is get books on the placement by respected, peer-reviewed scholars. study up on the Documentary hypothesis, Redaction grievance, Rhetorical grievance, and so on. scholars have an quite sound understanding of the Bible. the fashionable college of Biblical grievance is dedicated to understanding the textual content because it became understood by the unique hearers. i opt to apply the party of Animal Farm by George Orwell. Centuries from now, some human beings will push aside it as nonsense because it has talking animals. Others will trust that the farm quite existed, and that the animals quite talked. yet scholars will do not ignore that it truly is a complicated and state-of-the-paintings analogy for the Russian revolution. The Bible is an similar way. most of the first 5 books, as an example, were written as a critique of the Jewish schism interior the 9th century BC, and were by no skill meant to be historic past.
2016-11-24 21:39:37 · answer #2 · answered by hazelbush 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He would come across as a mumbling uneducated man while in reality he does have a degree.Bad public speaker and maybe also not so quick on his feet on the issues.Or not totally aware maybe of the real political questions.
2006-12-07 08:26:32 · answer #3 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He would rip who ever he was debating to shreds.The man is intelligent and when he does not have to restrict what he says comes across much different than he does at press conferences where he has to watch what he says.
2006-12-07 08:24:07 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
President Bush actually speaks best when it's his own words and from his heart. He won the debates, kicked Kerry all over the place. It was fun to watch.
2006-12-07 08:22:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Bush would ramble on like a lunatic that could not find his next thought.
2006-12-07 08:36:52 · answer #6 · answered by Lou 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
HE WOULD FALL RIGHT THE HELL APART!
How in the hell does anyone detach himself from reality so thorough to think Bush EVER outdebated Kerry.How dumb are they?
Bush never "won" a debate.Please.
2006-12-07 08:25:16 · answer #7 · answered by cannon Ball! 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
You left out that he could not have an earpiece in connecting him to someone telling him what to say.
To answer the question, it would be a complete disaster.
2006-12-07 08:27:24 · answer #8 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
I think Bush would surprise you. He is an excellent debater. He's just not much of a decider.
2006-12-07 08:20:10 · answer #9 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Total silence....camera flash....silence....sweat forming on brow....camera flash....wispers....camra flash....SPEW ON THE FRONT ROW!
2006-12-07 08:24:45 · answer #10 · answered by edubya 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋