English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

its tough but i think he was. nobody was ever close to being as dominating in a single player sport. Micheal Jordan also had the supporting cast in pippen and denis rodman(even if he is a pshyco he wasnt bad before) and who did tiger woods have? no one. Also tiger had tough competition in mickelson,singh, and many others. I think Tiger Woods was better by just a little bit. But that was a good question.

2006-12-07 07:48:49 · answer #1 · answered by No Life 2 · 0 0

Tiger over Michael, but that is really hard to find the commonality between the two

2006-12-07 15:45:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not even close. Tiger is far superior at his game. Jordan has done nothing that somebody else didn't already do before he came along.

2006-12-08 00:53:33 · answer #3 · answered by p p 2 · 0 0

no, when Michael was at his top, his team was invincible ( 3 rings + 3 rings) and Tiger Woods lost many championships and couldn´t make the grand slam.

2006-12-07 15:37:33 · answer #4 · answered by El Viejo Pantera 3 · 0 0

no way no comparisin jordan was the best athlete ever

2006-12-10 20:56:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes

2006-12-07 15:36:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

tie

2006-12-07 16:34:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

close, very close

2006-12-07 15:42:41 · answer #8 · answered by obvlious56 3 · 0 0

TIE

2006-12-07 15:45:40 · answer #9 · answered by smitty 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers