its tough but i think he was. nobody was ever close to being as dominating in a single player sport. Micheal Jordan also had the supporting cast in pippen and denis rodman(even if he is a pshyco he wasnt bad before) and who did tiger woods have? no one. Also tiger had tough competition in mickelson,singh, and many others. I think Tiger Woods was better by just a little bit. But that was a good question.
2006-12-07 07:48:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by No Life 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tiger over Michael, but that is really hard to find the commonality between the two
2006-12-07 15:45:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not even close. Tiger is far superior at his game. Jordan has done nothing that somebody else didn't already do before he came along.
2006-12-08 00:53:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by p p 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, when Michael was at his top, his team was invincible ( 3 rings + 3 rings) and Tiger Woods lost many championships and couldn´t make the grand slam.
2006-12-07 15:37:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by El Viejo Pantera 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no way no comparisin jordan was the best athlete ever
2006-12-10 20:56:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes
2006-12-07 15:36:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
tie
2006-12-07 16:34:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
close, very close
2006-12-07 15:42:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by obvlious56 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
TIE
2006-12-07 15:45:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by smitty 7
·
0⤊
1⤋