Is there any doubt that Hillary Clinton would be a much better President than the current ape in office now?

Answer 1

Of course she would. She would also fix the health care system. So lower wage classes could be covered also. It is sad the richest nation in the world has the worst health coverage and most protectionism to the health industies.

Answer 2

Yes, there is great doubt.

What has she done to make her a candidate for the most powerful position in the world? She's only held one political office in her life and she hasn't done much with the one she's got.

And why do looters, i mean liberals charge Conservatives with hate speech, then call the President an ape.

If Bush is an ape, he's sure done a better job than a Hilldabeast!

And remember, as the good senator loves to recall, she was named after Sir Edmond Hillary because her parents thought so much of him after he climb Mt. Everest - even though he was an unknown shepherd when she was born. Hillary didn't climb Mt. Everest until 1953 and your Hillary was born in 1947.

Answer 3

While not necessarily a Hillary fan I would say she would be a finer president than Bush. This nonsense about more attacks with Hillary in office is just unfounded and a B.S. argument. How many Americans lives have we lost under Bush's watch. He has failed at what in my opinion is the fundamental job of the government and that is to protect the people. These arguments against Hillary I see on here are all just scare tactics with no facts to back it up.

Answer 4

Yes. Plenty of doubt. She was already president before, kinda. Remember how her and Bill were "Co-Presidents"? Well Hillary tried to shove universal healthcare down Americans throats, and would undoubtedly try again if she returns to the White House.

Answer 5

Here is a list of some of the problems with Hilary:
- Manapausal. Therefore, not healthy for high stress situations.
- Low IQ
- Only popular amongst Lesbians
- Can NOT handle Wars
- Will most likely have an affair with an 18 years old Intern
- Will bring her husband to White House again!!!

Need I say more?

Answer 6

Yes lots of doubt. Surprise, surprise.

In the words of Dick Morris in comparing Hillary to Bill:

"Those who know both Hillary and Bill well and are willing to speak frankly in public realize the fundamental differences between the two and grasp how his abilities are the counterpoints to her defects.

He is intensely creative, constantly turning issues over in his mind seeking new solutions. She rarely has a new idea but specializes in advocacy — the rote recitation of talking points.

He has an instinctual feel for people and an uncanny ability to read a room and know what everyone in it is thinking. She is obtuse in her understanding of people and ham-handed in her approach.

He cares deeply about being loved. She seeks popularity as a means to the goal of getting elected but otherwise marches to the beat of her inner, liberal drummer.

He distrusts ideology, and his innate perfectionism finds all belief systems flawed. She swallows the ideological line of the guru du jour hook, line and sinker. During the healthcare years, it was Ira Magaziner who pushed her buttons. When she decided to back the Iraq War, it was the generals who paraded before her committee. She is vulnerable to a cultish adoration of the guys with all the answers.

He lets the give and take of politics wash off his back. A critic is a potential convert whom he hopes to charm over to his side. She has a rigidly dichotomized view of friends and enemies, demanding total loyalty and public silence from the former and maintaining a ruthless determination to destroy the latter. She is a Democratic Nixon to those whom she perceives as her enemies.

He is a moderate by instinct, seeking incremental change. She devotedly and deeply believes in a European-style socialism in which government takes much more of our national income and offers a far wider array of services and benefits.

He’ll raise taxes when he has to. She’ll increase them just to redistribute income.

He’s most like Eisenhower, Kennedy and Bush Sr. — feeling his way, acting with caution, and skeptical of all advice. She is more like LBJ, Nixon or Bush Jr. — determined to charge ahead and do what she thinks needs to be done, the torpedoes be damned.

And finally, he knows who he is and, except for his private shortcomings, is not ashamed to let it show. She constantly seeks to reinvent herself and rigidly maintains an almost totally inaccurate image in public of what she is really like in private. He has little discipline. Hers is iron. His caution is innate. Hers is a learned response to what happens when people see who she really is.

He made a very good domestic-policy president. She would be a disaster at home and abroad."

Answer 7

1) Our current president is not an ape.
2) Hillary would be the worst president in US history & the worst public official since Caligula's horse.

Answer 8

I have no doubt that Hillary Clinton would, in fact, be just as bad as her husband.

Answer 9

Wow, if Hillary is in office, who knows how many attacks we would have had on American soil by now?

Answer 10

Is there any doubt that this isn't a question any more than the other soapboxing rants are?

Have a real question? Ask it. No one asked for your opinion about Ms. Clinton's capabilities as a Presidential candidate. You're entitled to your opinions. Try respecting other people's opinions as well.