2006-12-07 06:20:57 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
It's chess, not checkers, fool!!!!!
2006-12-07 06:26:48 · update #1
No, but every time the Republicans have been at the helm they totally ignore the average citizen to cater to big-business guys.
Every time Republicans have had a chance to make a great change, and impress America, they've dropped the ball.
I've been an Independent voter for years, and haven't voted Rep or Dem for years, either.
2006-12-07 09:00:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mr TADS is stable. He might desire to genuinely have yet another a style of crystal balls. And all this time i thought I had the monopoly of destiny perception. Hillary will win the Democratic nomination for President and could bypass directly to win the final election and placed to relax all that "women human beings can't be President" nonsense. Obama would be vp except Hillary comes to a decision to decide for a 'southern technique' with Edwards or a Hispanic selection with Richardson. Republicans will nominate Mitt Romney after Guiliani's famous individual fades as quickly as the Florida familiar opens up. watch for a extra interesting vp determination technique on the Republican section. Hillary will win in November and be sworn in January of '09. I no longer often decide for this to take place yet take place that's going to. i'm with Ron Paul for the era and then i will vote Libertarian up and down except there is yet another 'libertarian' working as a Democrat or Republican. whether that's Clinton, Obama or Edwards or whether that's Guiliani, McCain, Romney or Thompson what's the version? they're all puppets for the vendors of the Federal Reserve in basic terms as much as each and each individual who votes Democrat or Republican is to blame to flushing u . s . of america down the lavatory.
2016-10-14 05:25:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, the only people that have been talking about Hillary Clinton running for President has been neo-con wackos, that see a liberal conspiracy around every corner. But if they look in their closets, there will always be a Foley or a Kolbe. But hiding under their bed, is the winning ticket in 2008; Gore/ Kerry or Kerry/ Gore.
2006-12-07 07:36:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
That's funny. I think Hillary Clinton is the terrorist secret weapon to get the average citizen disconnected with and/or apathetic/feeling hopeless about American politics...
2006-12-07 07:53:28 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
1. Hillary cannot lose the Democratic nomination.
2. HIllary cannot win the national election.
.
2006-12-07 07:48:49 · answer #5 · answered by graftonhill 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
no...Obama in 08, the right man for the job.
Hillary is nothing but trouble and controversy. Time to change the face of the Dem's party...and the Gore's and Clinton's of the world need to step aside and let the change begin.
2006-12-07 08:59:24 · answer #6 · answered by Doctor J. 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary Clinton is the harlot in the Bible that rules Babylon (Iraq) and I know she is going to win the election!
2006-12-07 06:55:17 · answer #7 · answered by J.C. 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hillary is good for the GOP, but Al Sharpton is even better! If Al won the Dem nomination, you would see the biggest GOP landslide in history.
2006-12-07 06:25:30 · answer #8 · answered by robertbdiver 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Even Karl Rove isn't that tricky. Whatever damage she causes the Dems will be entirely self inflicted.
2006-12-07 07:08:51 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If only she could get Jesse Jackson to run with her for VP...man that would be sweet. Donald Duck would be able to take them.
2006-12-08 07:17:57 · answer #10 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋