2006-12-07 05:43:22 · 9 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
No, a person should be allowed to do whatever they need to do to get by
2006-12-07 05:49:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it should be against the law but it should be written in the employment guidelines of any job that you are not allowed to accept other employment from a competitor while being employed by said company. Any company that is not a competitor should be fair game. This should be an issue between the employer/employee; not the state or government.
2006-12-07 06:01:26 · answer #2 · answered by joybalbert 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all. Not everyone's primary job pays a good wage. And not everyone has the ability to get a higher paying job, for whatever reason.
Here in Los Angeles, the cost of living is EXTREMELY high. Minimum wage workers need at least 2 jobs to meet household expenses.
2006-12-07 06:07:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. This isn't Communist Russia where the state determines what you do and how you provide for your family. Each of us can decide how much of our time we want to commit to providing labor in the labor markets.
2006-12-07 05:51:04 · answer #4 · answered by lmnop 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not unless it is in your contract (assuming u have one), that you cannot work another job in addition to your current one.
2006-12-07 05:48:19 · answer #5 · answered by UriK 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why? I don't think so some people can survive w/o that?
unless its affecting one of them...
2006-12-07 06:40:07 · answer #6 · answered by crystal j 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't think of a good reason why it should.
2006-12-07 05:50:43 · answer #7 · answered by Niecy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What makes you bring that up?
2006-12-07 05:45:55 · answer #8 · answered by walt3233 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why?
2006-12-07 05:53:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋