cause they are commies
2006-12-07 05:43:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
The origin of modern use of red states and blue states aligning with Republicans and Democrats probably goes back to some of the backroom work in the 1996 presidential election. At the time personal computer software allowed campaigns to increasingly integrate mapping technology into their decision making. In 1996, Joshua Starr, an analyst at Penn & Schoen (Demoractic polling firm) was asked by Mark Penn to create maps (using MapInfo) for a weekly political strategy session held in the private residences the Clinton White House. The maps would show the latest polling trends in each state as well as track media buys by the Clinton re-election campaign (by DMA) and general campaign activities (such as campaign stops) by the Clinton and Dole campaigns. After a few meetings, Mr. Penn told Mr. Starr that President Clinton had asked why the Democrats were marked in blue and the Republicans were marked in red. Mr. Starr explained that he had done some research before preparing the maps, and had found that the networks had been inconsistent in their coloring through the years. Upon reflection, Mr. Starr said he decided for several reasons to use blue for Democrats and red for Republicans— – he did not want to associate Democrats with Red Communists (the 1996 White House was moving to the political center), and the loss of Blue Dog Democrats had hurt the party in Congress (blue was also the only color associated with a party, so it helped make the decision). The association of these colors and parties was then used among White House political insiders, and spread to the media and then the general public.
2006-12-07 05:47:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by boredperv 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
all of them choose a extreme assessment and overhaul- many purely do not artwork and could be trashed for good or torn all the way down to not something and rebuilt- others choose basically minor tweaks. On a appropriate word- i'm getting so fed up in listening to arguments for nationalized well-being care that contain "the unfavorable are going with out healthcare on the same time as the wealthy get the terrific interior the international" or some version while all of us with 0.5 a concepts knows it isnt actual. we've well-being care plans for the unfavorable at no fee to them often and while there's a cost that's minimum- in the event that they dont sign in that's THEIR fault. while they pass to a well-being center and choose help somebody engaged on the well-being center will artwork with them to coach for this coverage (thats what my cousin does for occasion) Social protection is a scam- you may get a minimum of two times the fee of return from a CD- now all of us understand that human beings will spend it in the event that they have it so we choose a equipment that locks it up some how whether that's our funds- while we die our babies could inherit it- they dont inherit SS- Black adult males on undemanding do not stay long sufficient to assemble yet they pay of their entire lives and their heirs get none of it- is that honest? there's a greater helpful way if we end identifying to purchase into type warfare rhetoric however not the only reason, one reason meds are so costly right that's that each and each different u . s . has fee caps on them- the businesses could make their a refund someplace and wager who gets caught with the bill of all of us elses arbitrary fee caps? We do. returned that's barely one ingredient of it...
2016-10-17 22:54:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
After MSM networks labeled Republican states, red in 1996, the color must have market tested well. Aggressive, militant, bold. Communism is known for its red flag, and moniker "Reds", but I doubt that socialism has a color or a flag.
2006-12-07 05:54:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have a hard time keeping these blue and red colors straight. If I knew they were going to be such a big issue, I would have paid more attention to the colors and less to what they meant.
2006-12-07 05:52:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they see red after the elections
2006-12-07 05:48:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sean 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
I'm not sure. I wish our mascot wasnt a donkey. I think you guys did it.
Maybe blue was already taken by us dems, and your only other choice wouldve been white(even though its not a color, its a hue) It wouldnt have been good for yall if white was your color.
2006-12-07 05:44:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by vanman8u 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Red is the color of all totalitarians, regardless of economic policies.
2006-12-07 05:46:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
It's the color of blood.
2006-12-07 05:47:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by wooliebear07 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Republicans do a lot of business with China and felt it would help them to bond with their Chinese brethren.
2006-12-07 05:46:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
I thought of that the other day. Does that mean that Hugo Chavez in Venezuela is a member of the GOP?
2006-12-07 05:43:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋