Now that Paris and Brittney have been hanging out together, Paris has been quoted saying that she wants "four kids before she's thirty"! She has also stated that she would make a good parent because she takes good care of her dog!
Does anyone agree with her? Just curious!
2006-12-07 05:09:34 · 27 answers · asked by CURVY 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
That would be four more screwed up hollywood kids we don't need.
2006-12-07 05:10:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 0⤋
If she takes such good care of her dog, then how did it wind up going missing a while back? And has anyone even seen her with her dog lately? I'm wondering if the poor thing is even still alive...
2006-12-07 13:31:29 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YIKES!!!! That is all I can say.. pray to god for those children and just be thankful she is so stinkin rich cause she will hire nannies, and hopefully good ones. And no just because you have a dog does not mean you will be a good parent she will never know what that is.
2006-12-07 13:12:47 · answer #3 · answered by Me, again 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She'll probably make her staff do all the work.
The kids might not get that much attention from her.
She'll probably regret what she said because sometimes or most of the times, she mentions something without thinking too clearly.
2006-12-07 13:26:36 · answer #4 · answered by cruel 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Becoming a parent can change people for the better. Who knows with paris but she could definitely provide for the children thats a plus.
2006-12-07 13:12:09 · answer #5 · answered by April L 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Okay, so there is an age limit for alcohol,
But any little nin-com-poop can have children.
I say lock her up for making such a threat.
2006-12-07 13:13:45 · answer #6 · answered by danksprite420 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There should be a law so those two dumb girls can't procreate. Yeah a dog is the same as a child.
2006-12-07 13:15:00 · answer #7 · answered by saharj007 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
heck no! I find her very irresponsible, and she does not take good care of her dog. I heard that she is actually mean to the poor animal:(
2006-12-07 13:12:12 · answer #8 · answered by Sarah j 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
noooo. Oh god, the poor kids would have to be taken into foster homes :( she shouldn't have kids.. she can't even be responsible and take care of herself much less anyone else!
2006-12-07 13:11:31 · answer #9 · answered by ♫ Porcelain 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No I don't see her as the type. Not right now
2006-12-07 21:17:31 · answer #10 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does that mean she'll carry her kids around in her handbag and pull them out to show them to photographers?
2006-12-07 13:13:50 · answer #11 · answered by x 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋