Example.. James Baker served under Reagan and Bush I, he speaks the honest truth about the failings of Bush II and he is vilified and abused by great men like Rush Limpdick, sorry Limpbaugh, and woman hater O'Reilly.
1 James Baker is worth 500 Rush, O'Reilly and Hannity.
2006-12-07 04:06:07 · 6 answers · asked by Blessed 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They just don't get it. These problems in Iraq and the middle east can be traced to the shortcomings, arrogance, and downright stupidity of Bush.
They want to blame anyone except this most horrible president, so they are now engaged in self-destructive acts that only point out how miserably inept and unworthy of power they truly are.
Long live America!
2006-12-07 04:10:47 · answer #1 · answered by Truth 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Some hate admitting the truth. I think we should have went into Iraq, but I sure didn't want it to fail. Hopefully something good comes out of it. Bush did fail to listen to his generals, and some of his generals failed to lead as good as they could. i think it is good people are taking a whole new look at the situation and how to fix it.
2006-12-07 12:11:39 · answer #2 · answered by Daniel 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Be honest: you don't care about Baker one iota. You care that he is criticizing the President. Period.
The Iraq Surrender Group has been thusfar worthless. These are the same flatulent old men who actually think that negotiating with Iran and Syria will help stabilize Iraq. Nevermind the fact that Iran and Syria are fueling the instability.
This is like eliminating the problem of Naziism by negotiating with Goebbels and Hitler.
2006-12-07 12:09:38 · answer #3 · answered by C = JD 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
everybody differs from everybody in opinions. you want to try and draw a line between republicans based on an opinion, but even though james baker disagrees with republicans about this one issue (as is his right) the republicans are not trying to force him out of politics all together.
now lets look at the dems... joe lieberman was said to be the voice of reason and the "concience" of the senate, the dems even "asked" him to run as vice president under al gore in order to give a sense of integrity to the ticket after bill clintons midnight cigar romps with 20 year old interns collapsed the integrity and trust of the american people. then when the "concience" of the senate voted with bush for the war in iraq, the dems refused to offer any backing of any kind for his re=election campain, and even went as far as to spend millions trying to defeat him.
yep, those liberals are shinning beacons of truth and vertue.
2006-12-07 12:17:37 · answer #4 · answered by mastenawba 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Ignorance is bliss.
2006-12-07 12:13:55 · answer #5 · answered by Bee 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Baker is a Saudi Lawyer, where the hell do you think his interests lie? Hmmm, he wants us to negotiate with Iran and Syria? Thats absurd! Baker is not my "esteemed leader". Unlike Democrats, I can actually criticize, or in this case, condemn a republican. Baker is scum to me
2006-12-07 12:08:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 6⤋