Okay, I suppose we should start at the basics:
First point: an atomic bomb explodes. The implosion you are thinking of is the initial charge that forces the radioactive isotopes together enabling the chain reaction. Once that reaction starts it is definately an explosion, not an implosion.
Second point: a black hole is nothing more than an extremely dense collection of matter. Imagine a star, only much more dense! As an object's density increases, its escape velocity increases. The escape velocity is the speed an object would have to travel at from the surface of the object in order to escape the attractive force of gravity. In a black hole, the density is so great that the escape velocity is higher than the speed of light. As nothing can travel faster than the speed of light (according to relativity, ignoring string theory and quantum entanglement) nothing can escape the force of attraction from gravity on the surface of the black hole.
Third point: a black hole does not suck anything. Just the same as you fall towards the earth and the earth falls towards the sun, something orbiting a black hole falls towards it. Consider our sun. If the density of the sun suddenly increased (i.e. it became more compact) but its mass was the same, it would have no greater attraction on the planet earth than it does now. If it became a black hole, it would still be just as attractive unless it gained mass. Black holes gain mass when objects fall into them (i.e. are not in a stable orbit around them). They don't 'suck' anything in.
2006-12-07 03:51:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mawkish 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, not enough mass, or energy, remember that it's when a star collapse on it's self from gravitational forces that creates a black hole in order to get that kind of mass and energy here on earth would require us to slam about 150g of anti matter with 150g of matter that should be enough energy but the mass????? that I can't help with I mean it's a star/sun that's huge, so no there really is no way for you to rip a hole in the fabric of space with two atomic bombs.
2006-12-07 13:41:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by matt v 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no lmao. An atomic bomb is too weak to rip space fabric.
You would need a nova bomb. A Planet buster, A star-killer, and then amplify it somehow so that it pushes and pulls gravity. If a bomb powerful enough to bust a planet open from the SURFACE or destabilize a stable star (like our sun) can disrupt gravity hard enough, it might reverse the polarity of that pinpoint, or local area of space fabric.
Kind of like turning a sock inside out, if the space fabric gets flipped where this kind of weapon discharged, you might get some kind of "Null" void, or black hole. The effect wouldnt be a good one. This hole may or may not have its own gravity. It might start sucking things into it, or it might just exist, with no external reactions. We definately would love to have a passive anomaly to study.
2006-12-07 03:47:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by sbravosystems 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. A black hollow is formed at the same time as great vast celeb dies. It takes position at the same time as a purple vast is going supernova and maintains collapsing lower than gravitation (it'w own) becomming denser and denser till it really is going to grow to be so dense that even gentle won't be able to damage out, by defination a singularity or a black hollow. Nuclear reactions in stars blow hydrogen outwards from them at the same time as gravitation pulls the hydrogen decrease back into them making stars a balancing act of varieties. even with the undeniable fact that, at the same time as the hydrogen runs out and the subsequent gas it burns are exhausted, the celeb has no extra gas left to burn and it collapses upon itself because the in common words last rigidity appearing on it truly is it really is gravitation. the potential for that occurring at the same time as a nuclear bomb detonates in area, is minute. Even the solar, a nuclear reactor by nature, has to shrink right into a community the size of an finished end to carry close it really is black hollow means. Realisticly, an merchandise has to grant a gravitational incentive for it really is fall down lower than it really is own gravitation. A nuclear bomb may only disperse or reason a repulsive dispersion of hydrogen, pushing outwards. even with the undeniable fact that, the gravitational incentive of a hydrogen bomb ot it really is alluring inwards rigidity isn't sufficient to fund the production of a black hollow.
2016-11-24 21:01:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by shoaf 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No ... and how do you make a bomb that implodes ?? I know you can make a bomb that compresses but it doesn't implode
2006-12-07 03:44:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gene 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
No it would not.
Explain how you IMPLODE a bomb.
Buildings are imploded, but it's still an explosion.
2006-12-07 03:48:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by ScottOttack 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ha, reminds me of Futurama
"All we need is some sort of doomsday device"
In Futurama, it is possible, however not in the real world.
2006-12-07 04:00:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, not enough mass.
2006-12-07 03:44:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋