At least now we know why he ruled like he did .Right?
2006-12-07 03:31:42 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think this question is better answered from an Iraqi civilian prespective............the answer is yes from polls conducted in Iraq
2006-12-07 03:36:21 · answer #1 · answered by Paul I 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What happens to college students when they first leave home to go to college? They go crazy experimenting with their new freedom. Now I am not saying they are just experimenting but it goes along the same lines. The new government is only a few years old. The government will gain control and the civil war will end. There will always be violence there just like there is violence here. Perfect peace does not exist. The people will eventually live in just as stable of an area with much more freedom this time.
2006-12-07 11:37:21 · answer #2 · answered by tree daddy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Another dimension to this question is that at the end of his rule, Saddam's wings were clipped considerably because of sanctions and no fly zones in the north and south. Even though Saddam was "in power" the Kurdish region was largely autonomous.
2006-12-07 11:38:32 · answer #3 · answered by AustinoBambino 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes and No there needs to be a Strong leader over there to keep the crazies in line but then again you cant just gas thousands of people see the problem is the middle east was and is a helpless cause that were just making worse i understand where the U.S. and we need to go police the world F**K that how about we feed the worl or educate it or help cure it from Aids and Cancer ? Much better things to spend our time and money on
2006-12-07 11:39:38 · answer #4 · answered by Lab Runner 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's awful to say it, but I think so. Bush is much more dangerous and irresponsible than Saddam. Bush managed to destroy Iraq.I feel really sorry for the children and all the innocent living there.
2006-12-07 11:37:23 · answer #5 · answered by Akasha Ishtar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he was replaced by someone even more cruel. In his days there was a lot of progress being made now its only regress instability.
2006-12-07 11:35:04 · answer #6 · answered by observer 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have a valid point. Iraq has to have an iron fist ruler to keep everyone in line!
2006-12-07 11:33:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Given the current events, yes it was.
2006-12-07 11:34:30 · answer #8 · answered by Wael 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I thought I heard he had 100,000's of people terminated?
2006-12-07 11:44:11 · answer #9 · answered by spareo1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
better for whom?
not for me
2006-12-07 11:35:39 · answer #10 · answered by ken y 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋