Seeing who chaired the group (James Baker) and his long history with GHW Bush and Reagan, and hearing how GWB has been taken care of in his previous failures, is this another bail-out?
Does this provide a convenient option for the President to get out of Iraq cleanly?
Do you think he'll adopt any of the group's recommendations?
2006-12-07 03:05:06 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The purpose of anything coming out of this Administration is to push the agenda of the Bushes in some form or fashion.
We had better keep a close eye on what this President does or he will have his brother in as the next president taking even more of our rights away. Then Jeb can make he and Georgie co-dictators. This President is certainly a part of the problem since he is at the root of most of the problems. He does not have a clue as to how to formulate a solution to anything.
2006-12-07 03:23:56 · answer #1 · answered by Lou 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
You know Scott, exactly what are you hoping to accomplish by continuing to fight against our President and continue this anti-Bush agenda?
Isn't there a time when we should ALL put this petty bickering behind us and attempt to work together to bring this country through these hard times.
It may make you feel better to keep fueling the fire but what are you doing to contribute to our country getting through this mess successfully.
I contend nothing. You are part of the problem., Certainly not part of the solution.
2006-12-07 03:11:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Considering the fact that they recommend involving negotiations with Iran & Syria, I'd have to say no.
2006-12-07 03:08:07 · answer #3 · answered by ddey65 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's more like Dad pulling son's pants down and spanking him in front of the whole country, not that it matters much.
Son REALLY screwed up.
2006-12-07 03:08:17 · answer #4 · answered by Truth 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋